data built 2026-10-19T13:16:53Z

Look up another CVE · open CVE-2026-98864 in the interactive tracker

CVE-2026-98864

sched_ext: Wait for SCX_OPSS_DISPATCHING before reenqueueing a task

Published 2026-10-18 (today) by the Linux kernel CNA. Subsystem kernel/sched. Debian urgency: unimportant.

What to do, per Debian release

Debian's own status for CVE-2026-98864 in every release this site tracks, and what each one means in practice. Every status below is the one the Debian Security Team publishes for this CVE. source

ReleaseStatus VersionWhat this means
Debian 12bookwormnot affected6.1.190-1Nothing to do. bookworm never shipped the vulnerable code.
Debian 13trixienot affected6.12.113-1Nothing to do. trixie never shipped the vulnerable code.
Debian 14forkyfixed7.2.10-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 7.2.10-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian unstablesidfixed7.2.10-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 7.2.10-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.

The vulnerability

What the bug is

ebf1ccff79c4 ("sched_ext: Fix ops.dequeue() semantics") moved the final ops_state store in scx_dispatch_enqueue() after the DSQ unlock so that the custody update and ops.dequeue() precede it. A task can thus be found on a DSQ while still SCX_OPSS_DISPATCHING. The dequeue and core-sched pick paths wait for the state to clear in ops_dequeue() but the reenqueue paths don't. A reenqueue in that window runs ops.enqueue() and sets SCX_OPSS_QUEUED before the dispatch has completed. The dispatcher's final store then overwrites it with SCX_OPSS_NONE and finish_dispatch() drops every later dispatch of the task. Wait for SCX_OPSS_DISPATCHING to clear before dequeueing a task for reenqueue, the same way ops_dequeue() does.

Where it lives

The fix touches these files. If the subsystem is one you do not use, the practical exposure is lower, though the package is still the vulnerable one.

kernel/sched/ext/ext.c
kernel/sched/ext/internal.h
kernel/sched/ext/sub.c

What this is
SCHEDULER - SCHED_EXTMAINTAINERS section matched on kernel/sched/ext/ · sched-ext@lists.linux.dev · Maintained
Show whether Debian builds this, per release

Not established. This site could not find the build rule for the affected file in the kernel trees Debian ships, so it has no answer about whether Debian compiles this code. Read that as unknown, never as absent.

  • bookworm, trixie, forky, sid?
?
not established - no Makefile entry for the affected file

Where a release above reads "not established", no build rule for the affected file was found in that release's kernel tree. That is a gap in this lookup, not a finding that the code is absent.

From the configuration Debian publishes for every kernel flavour it builds. It covers only the architectures Debian ships a linux-config package for, and nothing about a kernel you built yourself. Debian's own status above stays authoritative about the source package.MAINTAINERS

Signals

Published
2026-10-18 (today)source
CVSS
no vector published, unrated
Attack vector
not published
EPSS
not scored
CISA KEV
not listedthe KEV catalogue
Debian urgency
unimportantsource
Subsystem
kernel/sched

Upstream fixes

The versions the CNA records as introducing and fixing this, and the commit for each. source

IntroducedFixed inCommit
7.17.2.1043457bf65500
7.17.37de9a6fb44ea

Why the CNA scored it this way

The kernel CNA published no CVSS vector and no reasoning for CVE-2026-98864, which is why it is shown as unrated rather than given an invented score. 6,405 of the 20,413 CVEs here carry reasoning; this is not one of them.