data built 2026-10-19T13:16:53Z

Look up another CVE · open CVE-2026-98825 in the interactive tracker

CVE-2026-98825

rtc: mpfs: fix unchecked devm_clk_get() error pointer in probe()

Published 2026-10-18 (today) by the Linux kernel CNA. Subsystem drivers/rtc. Debian urgency: not yet assigned.

What to do, per Debian release

Debian's own status for CVE-2026-98825 in every release this site tracks, and what each one means in practice. Every status below is the one the Debian Security Team publishes for this CVE. source

ReleaseStatus VersionWhat this means
Debian 12bookwormvulnerable6.1.190-1No fix published anywhere yet, neither in Debian nor upstream for the series bookworm tracks. Watch the Debian tracker page for this CVE. Advisories for bookworm have historically landed a median of 23 days after publication.
Debian 13trixiefixed6.12.113-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 6.12.113-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian 14forkyfixed7.2.10-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 7.2.10-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian unstablesidfixed7.2.10-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 7.2.10-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.

The vulnerability

What the bug is

devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "rtcref")'s return value was passed straight into clk_get_rate() without checking it for an error first, unlike the "rtc" clock a few lines above which is correctly checked with IS_ERR(). clk_get_rate() only guards against a NULL clk, not an error pointer: if (!clk) return 0; ... rate = clk_core_get_rate_recalc(clk->core); so if devm_clk_get() ever returns an error pointer here (for example ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER), which is the normal, expected outcome if the clkcfg clock-provider this RTC depends on has not registered its clocks yet by the time this driver probes), clk_get_rate() dereferences that error pointer instead of returning 0, crashing instead of letting probe defer. Capture the clock in the existing 'clk' local and check it with IS_ERR() before calling clk_get_rate(), matching the handling already used for the "rtc" clock in this same function.

Where it lives

The fix touches these files. If the subsystem is one you do not use, the practical exposure is lower, though the package is still the vulnerable one.

drivers/rtc/rtc-mpfs.c

What this is
RISC-V MICROCHIP SUPPORTMAINTAINERS section matched on drivers/rtc/rtc-mpfs.c · linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org · Supported
Kernel module
rtc_mpfs

Check it on the machine

grep -wE 'CONFIG_RTC_DRV_POLARFIRE_SOC|CONFIG_RTC_LIB' /boot/config-$(uname -r)

Reads the booted kernel's own configuration, on the machine and nowhere else. =y is built in, =m is a module, and an is not set line means the code is not there.

lsmod | grep -w rtc_mpfs

Prints a line if that module is loaded right now, and nothing if it is not. One that is not loaded can still be loaded later by anything that needs it.

Show whether Debian builds this, per release

Debian does not build this code in 1 release. It does build it in 3 releases, so the answer depends on which release the machine runs.

  • bookwormn
  • trixieMnot built on amd64/amd64, amd64/cloud-amd64, amd64/rt/amd64, arm64/arm64, arm64/arm64-16k, arm64/cloud-arm64, arm64/rt/arm64, armel/rpi, armhf/armmp, armhf/armmp-lpae, armhf/rt/armmp, ppc64el/powerpc64le, ppc64el/powerpc64le-64k, s390x/s390x
  • forky, sidMnot built on amd64/amd64, amd64/cloud-amd64, amd64/rt-amd64, arm64/arm64, arm64/arm64-16k, arm64/cloud-arm64, arm64/rt-arm64, armhf/armmp, armhf/armmp-lpae, loong64/loong64, ppc64el/powerpc64le, ppc64el/powerpc64le-64k, s390x/s390x
n
not enabled on any flavour - this release does not build the code
M
a module where it is built at all; some flavours do not build it
Build switches
CONFIG_RTC_DRV_POLARFIRE_SOC, CONFIG_RTC_LIB
Reads as
all on means the file is compiled; any one off means it is not.

From the configuration Debian publishes for every kernel flavour it builds. It covers only the architectures Debian ships a linux-config package for, and nothing about a kernel you built yourself. Debian's own status above stays authoritative about the source package.MAINTAINERS kbuild Makefiles Debian linux-config packages

Signals

Published
2026-10-18 (today)source
CVSS
no vector published, unrated
Attack vector
not published
EPSS
not scored
CISA KEV
not listedthe KEV catalogue
Debian urgency
not yet assignedsource
Subsystem
drivers/rtc

Upstream fixes

The versions the CNA records as introducing and fixing this, and the commit for each. source

IntroducedFixed inCommit
6.06.12.11374dc7c52946e
6.06.18.56cfd70c9b1984
6.07.2.108a03f8422fa0
6.07.3ac41b05d15db

Why the CNA scored it this way

The kernel CNA published no CVSS vector and no reasoning for CVE-2026-98825, which is why it is shown as unrated rather than given an invented score. 6,405 of the 20,413 CVEs here carry reasoning; this is not one of them.