data built 2026-10-19T13:16:53Z

Look up another CVE · open CVE-2026-98262 in the interactive tracker

CVE-2026-98262

ata: libahci: clear PxCLBU and PxFBU for AHCI_HFLAG_32BIT_ONLY

EPSS 0.2%

Published 2026-10-06 (13 days ago) by the Linux kernel CNA. Subsystem drivers/ata. Debian urgency: not yet assigned.

Debian does not build this code. The per-release build detail is under "Where it lives" below.

What to do, per Debian release

Debian's own status for CVE-2026-98262 in every release this site tracks, and what each one means in practice. Every status below is the one the Debian Security Team publishes for this CVE. source

ReleaseStatus VersionWhat this means
Debian 12bookwormfixedDLA-4841-1 · 2026-10-17 · text6.1.190-1Update the kernel and reboot. DLA-4841-1 shipped the fix on 2026-10-17, in 6.1.190-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian 13trixiefixedDSA-6568-1 · 2026-10-16 · text6.12.113-1Update the kernel and reboot. DSA-6568-1 shipped the fix on 2026-10-16, in 6.12.113-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian 14forkyfixed7.2.8-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 7.2.8-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian unstablesidfixed7.2.8-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 7.2.8-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.

The vulnerability

What the bug is

A user reported that commit 105c42566a55 ("ata: ahci: force 32-bit DMA for JMicron JMB582/JMB585") made the JMicron JMB585 unusable on his board. The failure is seen as soon as the ahci driver is probed, and booting with iommu=off does not solve the problem. Looking at the AHCI specification, PxCLBU and PxFBU are both read only '0' for HBAs that do not support 64-bit addressing. For HBAs that do support 64-bit addressing, the registers are read write, with a reset value that is Implementation Specific. When using the AHCI_HFLAG_32BIT_ONLY flag, the HBA does support 64-bit addressing, and a 32-bit DMA mask is set by simply clearing HOST_CAP_64. Thus, in this case, we need to explicitly clear the registers to 0.

Where it lives

The fix touches these files. If the subsystem is one you do not use, the practical exposure is lower, though the package is still the vulnerable one.

drivers/ata/libahci.c

What this is
LIBATA SUBSYSTEM (Serial and Parallel ATA drivers)MAINTAINERS section matched on drivers/ata/ · linux-ide@vger.kernel.org · Maintained
Kernel module
none to look for. The file would have gone into libahci, and Debian does not compile it into that module, so finding libahci in lsmod would say nothing about this CVE.

Check it on the machine

grep -wE 'CONFIG_AHCI_BRCM|CONFIG_AHCI_CEVA|CONFIG_AHCI_DA850|CONFIG_AHCI_DM816|CONFIG_AHCI_DWC|CONFIG_AHCI_IMX|CONFIG_AHCI_MTK|CONFIG_AHCI_MVEBU|CONFIG_AHCI_QORIQ|CONFIG_AHCI_ST|CONFIG_AHCI_SUNXI|CONFIG_AHCI_TEGRA|CONFIG_AHCI_XGENE|CONFIG_ATA|CONFIG_SATA_ACARD_AHCI|CONFIG_SATA_AHCI|CONFIG_SATA_AHCI_PLATFORM|CONFIG_SATA_AHCI_SEATTLE|CONFIG_SATA_HIGHBANK' /boot/config-$(uname -r)

Reads the booted kernel's own configuration, on the machine and nowhere else. =y is built in, =m is a module, and an is not set line means the code is not there.

Show whether Debian builds this, per release

Debian does not build this code. In 4 releases below, every kernel flavour Debian publishes has the switch off, so the vulnerable file is compiled into no kernel binary Debian ships.

  • bookworm, trixie, forky, sidn
n
not enabled on any flavour - this release does not build the code
Build switches
CONFIG_AHCI_BRCM, CONFIG_AHCI_CEVA, CONFIG_AHCI_DA850, CONFIG_AHCI_DM816, CONFIG_AHCI_DWC, CONFIG_AHCI_IMX, CONFIG_AHCI_MTK, CONFIG_AHCI_MVEBU, CONFIG_AHCI_QORIQ, CONFIG_AHCI_ST, CONFIG_AHCI_SUNXI, CONFIG_AHCI_TEGRA, CONFIG_AHCI_XGENE, CONFIG_ATA, CONFIG_SATA_ACARD_AHCI, CONFIG_SATA_AHCI, CONFIG_SATA_AHCI_PLATFORM, CONFIG_SATA_AHCI_SEATTLE, CONFIG_SATA_HIGHBANK
Reads as
all on means the file is compiled; any one off means it is not.

From the configuration Debian publishes for every kernel flavour it builds. It covers only the architectures Debian ships a linux-config package for, and nothing about a kernel you built yourself. Debian's own status above stays authoritative about the source package.MAINTAINERS kbuild Makefiles Debian linux-config packages

Signals

Published
2026-10-06 (13 days ago)source
CVSS
no vector published, unrated
Attack vector
not published
EPSS
0.18%, higher than 7.5% of all CVEssource
CISA KEV
not listedthe KEV catalogue
Debian urgency
not yet assignedsource
Subsystem
drivers/ata

Upstream fixes

The versions the CNA records as introducing and fixing this, and the commit for each. source

IntroducedFixed inCommit
2.6.225.10.2710191c9ff23ef
2.6.225.15.2228f510f68208a
2.6.226.1.1894719424bb7cb
2.6.226.6.158a5a8b4737f68
2.6.226.12.112b28a17d4a9bb
2.6.226.18.54b691a3e24427
2.6.227.2.87912ad8fb523
2.6.227.382e47533221d

Debian advisories

AdvisoryDateShipped toDebian
DLA-4841-12026-10-17bookworm 6.1.190-1tracker
DSA-6568-12026-10-16trixie 6.12.113-1tracker

Why the CNA scored it this way

The kernel CNA published no CVSS vector and no reasoning for CVE-2026-98262, which is why it is shown as unrated rather than given an invented score. 6,405 of the 20,413 CVEs here carry reasoning; this is not one of them.