data built 2026-10-19T13:16:53Z

Look up another CVE · open CVE-2026-93228 in the interactive tracker

CVE-2026-93228

svcrdma: Reject Write/Reply chunks with segcount 0

9.1 EPSS 0.5% AV:N

Published 2026-09-24 (24 days ago) by the Linux kernel CNA. Subsystem net/sunrpc. Debian urgency: not yet assigned.

What to do, per Debian release

Debian's own status for CVE-2026-93228 in every release this site tracks, and what each one means in practice. Every status below is the one the Debian Security Team publishes for this CVE. source

ReleaseStatus VersionWhat this means
Debian 12bookwormvulnerable6.1.190-1No fix published anywhere yet, neither in Debian nor upstream for the series bookworm tracks. Watch the Debian tracker page for this CVE. Advisories for bookworm have historically landed a median of 23 days after publication.
Debian 13trixiefixedDSA-6528-1 · 2026-09-29 · text6.12.111-1Update the kernel and reboot. DSA-6528-1 shipped the fix on 2026-09-29, in 6.12.111-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian 14forkyfixed7.2.6-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 7.2.6-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian unstablesidfixed7.2.6-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 7.2.6-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian 12bookworm · linux-6.12fixedDLA-4817-1 · 2026-10-04 · text6.12.111-1~deb12u1Update the kernel and reboot. DLA-4817-1 shipped the fix on 2026-10-04, in 6.12.111-1~deb12u1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.

The vulnerability

What the bug is

A peer can send a Write or Reply chunk whose segcount field is zero. xdr_check_write_chunk() only rejects segcount > rc_maxpages, so zero passes the range check, and xdr_inline_decode(stream, 0) returns the current (non-NULL) cursor without advancing. The function returns true and pcl_alloc_write() then links a struct svc_rdma_chunk with ch_segcount == 0 onto rc_write_pcl or rc_reply_pcl. An earlier patch in this series made pcl_for_each_segment() safe for ch_segcount == 0, so this no longer drives the memory walk it used to. Rejecting the malformed frame at the decode boundary is still worthwhile as defense in depth: it keeps degenerate zero-segment chunks off the parsed chunk lists entirely, so any future consumer that walks ch_segments directly cannot observe one, and it makes the zero-floor easy to backport to trees where the macro change is more intrusive. RFC 8166 has no meaning for a Write/Reply chunk that describes no remote buffer, so no legitimate client is affected. xdr_check_reply_chunk() funnels Reply chunks through xdr_check_write_chunk() and inherits the same rejection. pcl_alloc_write() also links each chunk onto the parsed chunk list before filling its segment array. If a future change weakens the segcount-0 rejection, an incomplete chunk is visible to consumers during the fill loop. Reorder so that list_add_tail() follows the segment fill loop, ensuring only fully-populated chunks appear on the list.

Where it lives

The fix touches these files. If the subsystem is one you do not use, the practical exposure is lower, though the package is still the vulnerable one.

net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_pcl.c
net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_recvfrom.c

What this is
KERNEL NFSD, SUNRPC, AND LOCKD SERVERSMAINTAINERS section matched on net/sunrpc/ · linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org · Supported
Kernel module
rpcrdma

Check it on the machine

grep -wE 'CONFIG_SUNRPC|CONFIG_SUNRPC_XPRT_RDMA' /boot/config-$(uname -r)

Reads the booted kernel's own configuration, on the machine and nowhere else. =y is built in, =m is a module, and an is not set line means the code is not there.

lsmod | grep -w rpcrdma

Prints a line if that module is loaded right now, and nothing if it is not. One that is not loaded can still be loaded later by anything that needs it.

Show whether Debian builds this, per release

Debian builds this as a loadable module. Every release below compiles it as a module on every flavour, so whether the code is in the running kernel depends on whether that module is loaded.

  • bookworm, trixie, forky, sid, bookworm · linux-6.12m
m
a loadable module on every flavour - check lsmod, can be blacklisted
Build switches
CONFIG_SUNRPC, CONFIG_SUNRPC_XPRT_RDMA
Reads as
all on means the file is compiled; any one off means it is not.

From the configuration Debian publishes for every kernel flavour it builds. It covers only the architectures Debian ships a linux-config package for, and nothing about a kernel you built yourself. Debian's own status above stays authoritative about the source package.MAINTAINERS kbuild Makefiles Debian linux-config packages

Signals

Published
2026-09-24 (24 days ago)source
CVSS
9.1 critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:Hsource recompute it
Attack vector
network (AV:N)source
EPSS
0.47%, higher than 39.5% of all CVEssource
CISA KEV
not listedthe KEV catalogue
Debian urgency
not yet assignedsource
Subsystem
net/sunrpc

Upstream fixes

The versions the CNA records as introducing and fixing this, and the commit for each. source

IntroducedFixed inCommit
5.116.12.111fe533ae1bed2
5.116.18.50a798714b5804
5.117.2.445dbdb2637b7
5.117.39808eb765666

Debian advisories

AdvisoryDateShipped toDebian
DLA-4817-12026-10-04bookworm 6.12.111-1~deb12u1tracker
DSA-6528-12026-09-29trixie 6.12.111-1tracker

Why the CNA scored it this way

Quoted from the kernel CNA's own scoring file, word for word. A highlighted metric carries the most severe value CVSS v3.1 defines for it, which is what pushes the score up. source

AV:NAttack vector, network
A remote NFS/RDMA peer places a Write or Reply chunk with segcount 0 in the RPC-over-RDMA transport header; svc_rdma_recvfrom() → svc_rdma_xdr_decode_req() → xdr_check_write_list()/xdr_check_reply_chunk() → xdr_check_write_chunk() accepted that field over iWARP or routable RoCEv2.
AC:LAttack complexity, low
The attacker sets RPCRDMA_CMP_F_SND_W_INV_OK in the RDMA-CM private connect blob (svc_rdma_parse_connect_private) and sends a Write/Reply chunk with segcount 0; xdr_check_write_chunk() only rejected segcount > rc_maxpages, xdr_inline_decode(0) returns the cursor, and pcl_alloc_write() links a ch_segcount==0 chunk with no race.
PR:NPrivileges required, none
xdr_check_write_chunk() and pcl_alloc_write() run in svc_rdma_xdr_decode_req() from svc_rdma_recvfrom() while parsing the transport header, before svc_xprt_do_recv() calls svc_process()/svc_authenticate(); RDMA CM accept performs no NFS credential check.
UI:NUser interaction, none
The attacker only needs to connect to a listening NFS/RDMA service and send an RPC-over-RDMA Call whose Write list or Reply chunk has segcount 0; no victim mount, click, or other user action is required.
S:UScope, unchanged
pcl_alloc_write() installs the empty chunk on the host kernel rc_write_pcl/rc_reply_pcl, and the subsequent heap walk and general protection fault stay inside nfsd's RPC-over-RDMA server; this is not a VM, IOMMU, or sandbox escape.
C:HConfidentiality impact, high
Accepting segcount 0 in xdr_check_write_chunk() lets pcl_alloc_write() put a ch_segcount==0 Write/Reply chunk on the parsed list; pcl_for_each_segment then uses &ch_segments[0u-1u] and walks adjacent kernel heap at sizeof(struct svc_rdma_segment) stride, an unbounded out-of-bounds read.
I:NIntegrity impact, none
svc_rdma_get_inv_rkey() only loads segment->rs_handle from the overrun pointer to choose an invalidate rkey; Write/Reply encode and RDMA Write paths index with segno < ch_segcount and skip or return -E2BIG on an empty chunk, so there is no out-of-bounds write or control-flow hijack.
A:HAvailability impact, high
The underflowed pcl_for_each_segment walk of the empty Write/Reply chunk continues until it hits unmapped memory and raises a general protection fault, oopsing or panicking the kernel, and the peer can send another zero-segcount Call to repeat it.