Look up another CVE · open CVE-2026-80920 in the interactive tracker
CVE-2026-80920
io_uring: defer eventfd signaling when queued from a wakeup handler
Published 2026-09-09 (39 days ago) by the Linux kernel CNA. Subsystem include/linux. Debian urgency: not yet assigned.
What to do, per Debian release
Debian's own status for CVE-2026-80920 in every release this site tracks, and what each one means in practice. Every status below is the one the Debian Security Team publishes for this CVE. source
| Release | Status | Version | What this means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian 12bookworm | vulnerable | 6.1.190-1 | No fix published anywhere yet, neither in Debian nor upstream for the series bookworm tracks. Watch the Debian tracker page for this CVE. Advisories for bookworm have historically landed a median of 23 days after publication. |
| Debian 13trixie | vulnerable | 6.12.113-1 | No fix published anywhere yet, neither in Debian nor upstream for the series trixie tracks. Watch the Debian tracker page for this CVE. Advisories for trixie have historically landed a median of 11 days after publication. |
| Debian 14forky | fixed | 7.1.12-1 | Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 7.1.12-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts. |
| Debian unstablesid | fixed | 7.1.12-1 | Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 7.1.12-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts. |
The vulnerability
What the bug is
io_req_local_work_add() signals the CQ ring eventfd inline when it is the one to push the first entry onto ->work_list. For DEFER_TASKRUN rings that add is frequently done from a waitqueue wakeup handler, where an arbitrary waitqueue lock is held. eventfd_signal_mask() only refuses to recurse when current->in_eventfd is set, but that bit is set by eventfd_signal_mask() itself. If the wake chain starts somewhere else, signal goes out inline and can feed back into epoll. Add IOU_F_TWQ_IN_WAKE, set it on the task_work add done from the three waitqueue callbacks, and use it to force io_eventfd_signal() down the existing call_rcu_hurry() deferral instead of signaling inline.
Where it lives
The fix touches these files. If the subsystem is one you do not use, the practical exposure is lower, though the package is still the vulnerable one.
include/linux/io_uring_types.h
io_uring/eventfd.c
io_uring/eventfd.h
io_uring/futex.c
io_uring/io_uring.c
io_uring/poll.c
io_uring/tw.c
io_uring/waitid.c
- What this is
- IO_URINGMAINTAINERS section matched on include/linux/io_uring_types.h · io-uring@vger.kernel.org · Maintained
Check it on the machine
grep -w CONFIG_IO_URING /boot/config-$(uname -r)Reads the booted kernel's own configuration, on the machine and nowhere else. =y is built in, =m is a module, and an is not set line means the code is not there.
Show whether Debian builds this, per release
Debian builds this code. Every release below compiles the affected file into the kernels it ships.
- bookworm, trixie, forky, sidy
- y
- built into the kernel image on every flavour - only a patch removes it
- Build switch
- CONFIG_IO_URING
From the configuration Debian publishes for every kernel flavour it builds. It covers only the architectures Debian ships a linux-config package for, and nothing about a kernel you built yourself. Debian's own status above stays authoritative about the source package.MAINTAINERS kbuild Makefiles Debian linux-config packages
Signals
- Published
- 2026-09-09 (39 days ago)source
- CVSS
- no vector published, unrated
- Attack vector
- not published
- EPSS
- 0.16%, higher than 4.3% of all CVEssource
- CISA KEV
- not listedthe KEV catalogue
- Debian urgency
- not yet assignedsource
- Subsystem
- include/linux
Upstream fixes
The versions the CNA records as introducing and fixing this, and the commit for each. source
| Introduced | Fixed in | Commit |
|---|---|---|
| 6.1 | 6.18.49 | e22f4494cc94 |
| 6.1 | 7.1.11 | b6bb334b0e93 |
| 6.1 | 7.2.1 | 40b6ccf68731 |
| 6.1 | 7.3 | cd305ee3633a |
Why the CNA scored it this way
The kernel CNA published no CVSS vector and no reasoning for CVE-2026-80920, which is why it is shown as unrated rather than given an invented score. 6,405 of the 20,413 CVEs here carry reasoning; this is not one of them.