data built 2026-10-19T13:16:53Z

Look up another CVE · open CVE-2026-80773 in the interactive tracker

CVE-2026-80773

HID: huawei: fix missing hid_is_usb() check

EPSS 0.2%

Published 2026-09-04 (44 days ago) by the Linux kernel CNA. Subsystem drivers/hid. Debian urgency: unimportant.

What to do, per Debian release

Debian's own status for CVE-2026-80773 in every release this site tracks, and what each one means in practice. Every status below is the one the Debian Security Team publishes for this CVE. source

ReleaseStatus VersionWhat this means
Debian 12bookwormnot affected6.1.190-1Nothing to do. bookworm never shipped the vulnerable code.
Debian 13trixienot affected6.12.113-1Nothing to do. trixie never shipped the vulnerable code.
Debian 14forkyfixed7.1.12-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 7.1.12-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian unstablesidfixed7.1.12-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 7.1.12-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.

The vulnerability

What the bug is

to_usb_interface() can only be used on a hid_device whose parent is really USB; uhid can create devices that identify as being on BUS_USB, but don't actually have a USB parent. Fix the use of to_usb_interface() without a hid_is_usb() check. I have verified that it is currently possible to trigger a kernel splat due to this bug in an ASAN build, and that this commit fixes the issue.

Where it lives

The fix touches these files. If the subsystem is one you do not use, the practical exposure is lower, though the package is still the vulnerable one.

drivers/hid/hid-huawei.c

What this is
HID CORE LAYERMAINTAINERS section matched on drivers/hid/ · linux-input@vger.kernel.org · Maintained

Check it on the machine

grep -wE 'CONFIG_HID_HUAWEI|CONFIG_HID_SUPPORT' /boot/config-$(uname -r)

Reads the booted kernel's own configuration, on the machine and nowhere else. =y is built in, =m is a module, and an is not set line means the code is not there.

Show whether Debian builds this, per release

Debian does not build this code in 2 releases. The build rule could not be established for 2 releases, so nothing is claimed about those.

  • bookworm, trixie?
  • forky, sidn
?
not established - no Makefile entry for the affected file
n
not enabled on any flavour - this release does not build the code

Where a release above reads "not established", no build rule for the affected file was found in that release's kernel tree. That is a gap in this lookup, not a finding that the code is absent.

Build switches
CONFIG_HID_HUAWEI, CONFIG_HID_SUPPORT
Reads as
all on means the file is compiled; any one off means it is not.

From the configuration Debian publishes for every kernel flavour it builds. It covers only the architectures Debian ships a linux-config package for, and nothing about a kernel you built yourself. Debian's own status above stays authoritative about the source package.MAINTAINERS kbuild Makefiles Debian linux-config packages

Signals

Published
2026-09-04 (44 days ago)source
CVSS
no vector published, unrated
Attack vector
not published
EPSS
0.21%, higher than 10.0% of all CVEssource
CISA KEV
not listedthe KEV catalogue
Debian urgency
unimportantsource
Subsystem
drivers/hid

Upstream fixes

The versions the CNA records as introducing and fixing this, and the commit for each. source

IntroducedFixed inCommit
7.17.1.1166805454c01f
7.17.2.19acc2463991c
7.17.34cdb6b4b34d7

Why the CNA scored it this way

The kernel CNA published no CVSS vector and no reasoning for CVE-2026-80773, which is why it is shown as unrated rather than given an invented score. 6,405 of the 20,413 CVEs here carry reasoning; this is not one of them.