data built 2026-10-19T13:16:53Z

Look up another CVE · open CVE-2026-74305 in the interactive tracker

CVE-2026-74305

bpf: Tighten cgroup storage cookie checks for prog arrays

7.8 EPSS 0.2% AV:L

Published 2026-08-15 (2 months ago) by the Linux kernel CNA. Subsystem kernel/bpf. Debian urgency: not yet assigned.

What to do, per Debian release

Debian's own status for CVE-2026-74305 in every release this site tracks, and what each one means in practice. Every status below is the one the Debian Security Team publishes for this CVE. source

ReleaseStatus VersionWhat this means
Debian 12bookwormfixed6.1.180-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 6.1.180-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian 13trixiefixed6.12.100-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 6.12.100-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian 14forkyfixed7.1.5-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 7.1.5-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian unstablesidfixed7.1.5-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 7.1.5-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.

The vulnerability

What the bug is

The fix in commit abad3d0bad72 ("bpf: Fix oob access in cgroup local storage") is still incomplete. The prog-array compatibility check treats a program with no cgroup storage as compatible with any stored storage cookie. This allows a storage-less program to bridge a tail call chain between an entry program and a storage-using callee even though cgroup local storage at runtime still follows the caller's context, that is, A -> B(no storage) -> C(storage) path. Requiring exact cookie equality would break the legitimate case of a storage-less leaf program being tail called from a storage-using one. Instead, only accept a zero storage cookie if the program cannot perform tail calls itself. This keeps A -> B(no storage) working while rejecting the A -> B(no storage) -> C(storage) bridge.

Where it lives

The fix touches these files. If the subsystem is one you do not use, the practical exposure is lower, though the package is still the vulnerable one.

kernel/bpf/core.c

What this is
BPF [CORE]MAINTAINERS section matched on kernel/bpf/core.c · bpf@vger.kernel.org · Maintained

Check it on the machine

grep -w CONFIG_BPF /boot/config-$(uname -r)

Reads the booted kernel's own configuration, on the machine and nowhere else. =y is built in, =m is a module, and an is not set line means the code is not there.

Show whether Debian builds this, per release

Debian builds this code. Every release below compiles the affected file into the kernels it ships.

  • bookworm, trixie, forky, sidy
y
built into the kernel image on every flavour - only a patch removes it
Build switch
CONFIG_BPF

From the configuration Debian publishes for every kernel flavour it builds. It covers only the architectures Debian ships a linux-config package for, and nothing about a kernel you built yourself. Debian's own status above stays authoritative about the source package.MAINTAINERS kbuild Makefiles Debian linux-config packages

Signals

Published
2026-08-15 (2 months ago)source
CVSS
7.8 high
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Hsource recompute it
Attack vector
local (AV:L)source
EPSS
0.18%, higher than 6.6% of all CVEssource
CISA KEV
not listedthe KEV catalogue
Debian urgency
not yet assignedsource
Subsystem
kernel/bpf

Upstream fixes

The versions the CNA records as introducing and fixing this, and the commit for each. source

IntroducedFixed inCommit
5.15.1925.15.21287177497cca9
6.1.1516.1.1781c762d286984
6.6.1056.6.145eb73056ce2a6
6.12.466.12.979ca06849c423
6.176.18.4046fbafe3d2d5
6.177.1.5cb22dc79528e
6.177.210627ddc0167
6.16.100

Why the CNA scored it this way

Quoted from the kernel CNA's own scoring file, word for word. A highlighted metric carries the most severe value CVSS v3.1 defines for it, which is what pushes the score up. source

AV:LAttack vector, local
Exploitation requires local bpf() syscalls to load cgroup BPF programs/maps, populate a prog array, attach or test-run them; per kernel guidance BPF/cgroup hooks are Local even when later triggered by sockets or packets.
AC:LAttack complexity, low
The attacker fully controls crafting programs A/B/C, prog-array insertion order, and triggering the cgroup hook or BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN; no race or victim-dependent state is required to reach the mismatched-storage OOB path.
PR:LPrivileges required, low
Reaching the buggy compatibility check needs only local BPF privileges (CAP_BPF or unprivileged BPF where enabled) plus cgroup attach/test-run access obtainable by unprivileged users in delegated cgroups or user namespaces, not init-namespace root.
UI:NUser interaction, none
The attacker loads, wires, and triggers the malicious BPF program chain itself (e.g., creating a socket or using BPF_PROG_TEST_RUN); no action by another user or administrator is required.
S:UScope, unchanged
The out-of-bounds cgroup local storage access corrupts kernel heap memory within the same kernel security domain and enables local privilege escalation, not a cross-boundary VM, IOMMU, or sandbox escape.
C:HConfidentiality impact, high
Tail-called program C obtains a pointer from bpf_get_local_storage() backed by entry program A's smaller cgroup storage while verifier-approved helpers perform larger accesses, yielding controllable out-of-bounds kernel heap reads.
I:HIntegrity impact, high
The returned cgroup storage pointer is writable map memory, and size-mismatched helper copies (e.g., bpf_map_update_elem/copy_map_value_long) enable controllable out-of-bounds heap writes exploitable for kernel corruption and code execution.
A:HAvailability impact, high
The heap out-of-bounds read/write can corrupt adjacent kernel objects and readily trigger kernel oops/panic or denial of service, as demonstrated by the cgroup_storage_oob selftest expecting KASAN reports without the fix.