CVE-2026-72092

What the bug is

amdxdna_cmd_submit() calls xdna->dev_info->ops->cmd_submit() unconditionally, but only aie2_dev_ops defines that callback. aie4_vf_ops (the AIE4 SR-IOV virtual function) does not, so a user AMDXDNA_EXEC_CMD ioctl on an AIE4 device reaches a NULL function-pointer call and oopses the kernel. AIE4 submits work through a mapped user queue and doorbell, not this ioctl path. Reject the submission early with -EOPNOTSUPP when the device provides no cmd_submit op, so the shared EXEC ioctl is a clean no-op on such devices. Found by 0sec automated security-research tooling (https://0sec.ai).

Where it lives

The fix touches these files. If the subsystem is one you do not use, the practical exposure is lower, though the package is still the vulnerable one.

drivers/accel/amdxdna/amdxdna_ctx.c

What this is

AMD XDNA DRIVERMAINTAINERS section matched on drivers/accel/amdxdna/ · dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org · Supported

Kernel module

amdxdna

Check it on the machine

grep -wE 'CONFIG_DRM_ACCEL|CONFIG_DRM_ACCEL_AMDXDNA' /boot/config-$(uname -r)

Reads the booted kernel's own configuration, on the machine and nowhere else. =y is built in, =m is a module, and an is not set line means the code is not there.

lsmod | grep -w amdxdna

Prints a line if that module is loaded right now, and nothing if it is not. One that is not loaded can still be loaded later by anything that needs it.

Show whether Debian builds this, per release

Debian builds this, but not on every flavour. At least one release below builds the code on some of its kernel flavours and not on others, so the answer depends on the architecture and flavour installed. The build rule could not be established for 2 releases, so nothing is claimed about those.

• bookworm, trixie?
• forky, sidMnot built on amd64/cloud-amd64, arm64/arm64, arm64/arm64-16k, arm64/cloud-arm64, arm64/rt-arm64, armhf/armmp, armhf/armmp-lpae, loong64/loong64, ppc64el/powerpc64le, ppc64el/powerpc64le-64k, riscv64/riscv64, s390x/s390x

?

not established - no Makefile entry for the affected file

M

a module where it is built at all; some flavours do not build it

Where a release above reads "not established", no build rule for the affected file was found in that release's kernel tree. That is a gap in this lookup, not a finding that the code is absent.

Build switches

CONFIG_DRM_ACCEL, CONFIG_DRM_ACCEL_AMDXDNA

Reads as

all on means the file is compiled; any one off means it is not.

From the configuration Debian publishes for every kernel flavour it builds. It covers only the architectures Debian ships a linux-config package for, and nothing about a kernel you built yourself. Debian's own status above stays authoritative about the source package.MAINTAINERS kbuild Makefiles Debian linux-config packages

Signals

Published

2026-08-15 (2 months ago)source

CVSS

no vector published, unrated

Attack vector

not published

EPSS

0.21%, higher than 10.0% of all CVEssource

CISA KEV

not listedthe KEV catalogue

Debian urgency

unimportantsource

Subsystem

drivers/accel

Upstream fixes

The versions the CNA records as introducing and fixing this, and the commit for each. source

Introduced	Fixed in	Commit
6.14	6.18.42	af7a4c2caa7a
6.14	7.1.5	f7d08603c87b
6.14	7.2	38953513d731