data built 2026-10-19T13:16:53Z

Look up another CVE · open CVE-2026-68462 in the interactive tracker

CVE-2026-68462

bpf: Reject negative const offsets for buffer pointers

7.8 EPSS 0.2% AV:L

Published 2026-08-15 (2 months ago) by the Linux kernel CNA. Subsystem kernel/bpf. Debian urgency: unimportant.

What to do, per Debian release

Debian's own status for CVE-2026-68462 in every release this site tracks, and what each one means in practice. Every status below is the one the Debian Security Team publishes for this CVE. source

ReleaseStatus VersionWhat this means
Debian 12bookwormnot affected6.1.190-1Nothing to do. bookworm never shipped the vulnerable code.
Debian 13trixienot affected6.12.113-1Nothing to do. trixie never shipped the vulnerable code.
Debian 14forkyfixed7.1.5-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 7.1.5-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian unstablesidfixed7.1.5-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 7.1.5-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.

The vulnerability

What the bug is

The verifier rejects variable offsets for PTR_TO_TP_BUFFER and PTR_TO_BUF accesses, but it currently accepts a constant negative offset produced by pointer arithmetic. Commit 022ac0750883 ("bpf: use reg->var_off instead of reg->off for pointers") moved constant pointer offsets from reg->off to reg->var_off. However, __check_buffer_access() continued to check only the instruction offset. An access with reg->var_off equal to -8 and an instruction offset of zero therefore passes verification. For writable raw tracepoints, the access end is also calculated from the unsigned reg->var_off.value. An eight-byte access starting at -8 wraps the calculated end to zero, allowing the program to load and attach without increasing max_tp_access. After ensuring that reg->var_off is constant, calculate the effective access start using signed arithmetic and reject it when it is negative. Use the validated start to calculate the access end for both PTR_TO_TP_BUFFER and PTR_TO_BUF.

Where it lives

The fix touches these files. If the subsystem is one you do not use, the practical exposure is lower, though the package is still the vulnerable one.

kernel/bpf/verifier.c

What this is
BPF [CORE]MAINTAINERS section matched on kernel/bpf/verifier.c · bpf@vger.kernel.org · Maintained

Check it on the machine

grep -wE 'CONFIG_BPF|CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL' /boot/config-$(uname -r)

Reads the booted kernel's own configuration, on the machine and nowhere else. =y is built in, =m is a module, and an is not set line means the code is not there.

Show whether Debian builds this, per release

Debian builds this code. Every release below compiles the affected file into the kernels it ships.

  • bookworm, trixie, forky, sidy
y
built into the kernel image on every flavour - only a patch removes it
Build switches
CONFIG_BPF, CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
Reads as
all on means the file is compiled; any one off means it is not.

From the configuration Debian publishes for every kernel flavour it builds. It covers only the architectures Debian ships a linux-config package for, and nothing about a kernel you built yourself. Debian's own status above stays authoritative about the source package.MAINTAINERS kbuild Makefiles Debian linux-config packages

Signals

Published
2026-08-15 (2 months ago)source
CVSS
7.8 high
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Hsource recompute it
Attack vector
local (AV:L)source
EPSS
0.17%, higher than 5.4% of all CVEssource
CISA KEV
not listedthe KEV catalogue
Debian urgency
unimportantsource
Subsystem
kernel/bpf

Upstream fixes

The versions the CNA records as introducing and fixing this, and the commit for each. source

IntroducedFixed inCommit
7.17.1.5314bd592085c
7.17.2fd4cfa8c8f9a

Why the CNA scored it this way

Quoted from the kernel CNA's own scoring file, word for word. A highlighted metric carries the most severe value CVSS v3.1 defines for it, which is what pushes the score up. source

AV:LAttack vector, local
The bug is in bpf_check() during bpf(BPF_PROG_LOAD); the path is bpf_prog_load() → bpf_check() → check_mem_access() → __check_buffer_access() on PTR_TO_TP_BUFFER/PTR_TO_BUF. Per kernel CNA guidance BPF verifier bugs are Local, not network-reachable.
AC:LAttack complexity, low
Exploitation is deterministic: pointer arithmetic (e.g. r6 += -8) yields a constant negative reg->var_off that passes the insn-only check, and unsigned wrap sets max_tp_access/max_rdwr_access to zero. The attacker fully controls program bytecode and triggering with no race or layout dependency.
PR:LPrivileges required, low
Affected BPF_PROG_TYPE_RAW_TRACEPOINT_WRITABLE and BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACING/BPF_TRACE_ITER programs require CAP_BPF and CAP_PERFMON checked by bpf_token_capable(); BPF tokens delegate these capabilities into a non-init user namespace, so a namespace-local actor can reach bpf_prog_load without init-namespace root.
UI:NUser interaction, none
No victim interaction is required; after loading and attaching the malicious program the attacker triggers execution by reading a BPF iterator fd or causing a writable raw tracepoint to fire, entirely through their own syscalls.
S:UScope, unchanged
The verifier bypass permits out-of-bounds kernel reads/writes adjacent to tracepoint or iterator buffers within the same host kernel security authority; impact is standard kernel memory corruption and privilege escalation, not a VM, container, or IOMMU boundary crossing.
C:HConfidentiality impact, high
Verified loads at negative offsets read up to eight bytes before PTR_TO_TP_BUFFER or PTR_TO_BUF targets, disclosing adjacent kernel stack or kmalloc memory (map keys/values, tracepoint writable buffers); per guidance out-of-bounds kernel reads warrant High confidentiality impact.
I:HIntegrity impact, high
Writable raw tracepoint programs can store at negative offsets while max_tp_access wraps to zero, and PTR_TO_BUF iterator contexts allow verified writes before map value buffers; these out-of-bounds stores corrupt adjacent kernel memory with a plausible control-flow hijack primitive.
A:HAvailability impact, high
Out-of-bounds kernel memory accesses from attached BPF programs commonly provoke kernel oops or panic; the attacker can repeatedly trigger iterator reads or writable raw tracepoints to deny host availability.