data built 2026-10-19T13:16:53Z

Look up another CVE · open CVE-2026-64375 in the interactive tracker

CVE-2026-64375

proc: protect ptrace_may_access() with exec_update_lock (FD links)

7.8 EPSS 0.1% AV:L

Published 2026-07-25 (3 months ago) by the Linux kernel CNA. Subsystem fs/proc. Debian urgency: not yet assigned.

What to do, per Debian release

Debian's own status for CVE-2026-64375 in every release this site tracks, and what each one means in practice. Every status below is the one the Debian Security Team publishes for this CVE. source

ReleaseStatus VersionWhat this means
Debian 12bookwormfixedDLA-4720-1 · 2026-08-05 · text6.1.180-1Update the kernel and reboot. DLA-4720-1 shipped the fix on 2026-08-05, in 6.1.180-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian 13trixiefixedDSA-6405-1 · 2026-07-31 · text6.12.100-1Update the kernel and reboot. DSA-6405-1 shipped the fix on 2026-07-31, in 6.12.100-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian 14forkyfixed7.1.4-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 7.1.4-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian unstablesidfixed7.1.4-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 7.1.4-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian 12bookworm · linux-6.12fixedDLA-4724-1 · 2026-08-07 · text6.12.100-1~deb12u1Update the kernel and reboot. DLA-4724-1 shipped the fix on 2026-08-07, in 6.12.100-1~deb12u1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.

The vulnerability

What the bug is

proc_pid_get_link() and proc_pid_readlink() currently look up the task from the pid once, then do the ptrace access check on that task, then look up the task from the pid a second time to do the actual access. That's racy in several ways. To fix it, pass the task to the ->proc_get_link() handler, and instead of proc_fd_access_allowed(), introduce a new helper call_proc_get_link() that looks up and locks the task, does the access check, and calls ->proc_get_link().

Where it lives

The fix touches these files. If the subsystem is one you do not use, the practical exposure is lower, though the package is still the vulnerable one.

fs/proc/base.c
fs/proc/fd.c
fs/proc/internal.h

What this is
PROC FILESYSTEMMAINTAINERS section matched on fs/proc/ · linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org · Maintained

Check it on the machine

grep -w CONFIG_PROC_FS /boot/config-$(uname -r)

Reads the booted kernel's own configuration, on the machine and nowhere else. =y is built in, =m is a module, and an is not set line means the code is not there.

Show whether Debian builds this, per release

Debian builds this code. Every release below compiles the affected file into the kernels it ships.

  • bookworm, trixie, forky, sid, bookworm · linux-6.12y
y
built into the kernel image on every flavour - only a patch removes it
Build switch
CONFIG_PROC_FS

From the configuration Debian publishes for every kernel flavour it builds. It covers only the architectures Debian ships a linux-config package for, and nothing about a kernel you built yourself. Debian's own status above stays authoritative about the source package.MAINTAINERS kbuild Makefiles Debian linux-config packages

Signals

Published
2026-07-25 (3 months ago)source
CVSS
7.8 high
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Hsource recompute it
Attack vector
local (AV:L)source
EPSS
0.14%, higher than 2.7% of all CVEssource
CISA KEV
not listedthe KEV catalogue
Debian urgency
not yet assignedsource
Subsystem
fs/proc

Upstream fixes

The versions the CNA records as introducing and fixing this, and the commit for each. source

IntroducedFixed inCommit
2.6.185.10.2616253dfee5afb
2.6.185.15.21265bf0d2b6e91
2.6.186.1.178de497d7aa2fa
2.6.186.6.145138c692d2b2d
2.6.186.12.9783b17872e316
2.6.186.18.40497c6bae5167
2.6.187.1.4dfd1894cb64c
2.6.187.26255da28d4bb

Debian advisories

AdvisoryDateShipped toDebian
DLA-4724-12026-08-07bookworm 6.12.100-1~deb12u1tracker
DLA-4723-12026-08-07bullseye 6.1.180-1~deb11u1tracker
DLA-4720-12026-08-05bookworm 6.1.180-1tracker
DLA-4717-12026-08-05bullseye 5.10.262-1tracker
DSA-6405-12026-07-31trixie 6.12.100-1tracker

Why the CNA scored it this way

Quoted from the kernel CNA's own scoring file, word for word. A highlighted metric carries the most severe value CVSS v3.1 defines for it, which is what pushes the score up. source

AV:LAttack vector, local
Exploitation uses local open/openat or readlink syscalls against /proc/$pid symlinks; no network or physical access path reaches the flaw.
AC:LAttack complexity, low
The attacker can launch the setuid target process and race concurrent procfs accesses repeatedly, thereby controlling both sides of the race.
PR:LPrivileges required, low
A basic unprivileged user can pass the initial ptrace check against a same-UID dumpable child before it performs privileged exec; no capability is required.
UI:NUser interaction, none
The attacker can create and race the target by launching the setuid program directly, without action from another user.
S:UScope, unchanged
The procfs authorization bypass compromises privileged resources on the same host and constitutes ordinary local privilege escalation rather than crossing a VM or hardware isolation boundary.
C:HConfidentiality impact, high
The race can redirect an authorized pre-exec lookup to a private post-setuid memfd whose permissive shmem inode allows the attacker to read all privileged contents, including secrets.
I:HIntegrity impact, high
The attacker can obtain write and truncation access to the privileged memfd; corruption of trusted data or executable content consumed by the setuid process can yield root-level code execution.
A:HAvailability impact, high
Tampering with a privileged process's trusted memfd can crash or disable critical privileged services, and resulting root-level execution permits complete system availability loss.