data built 2026-10-19T13:16:53Z

Look up another CVE · open CVE-2026-64227 in the interactive tracker

CVE-2026-64227

ACPI: driver: Check ACPI_COMPANION() against NULL during probe

EPSS 0.2%

Published 2026-07-24 (3 months ago) by the Linux kernel CNA. Subsystem drivers/acpi. Debian urgency: unimportant.

What to do, per Debian release

Debian's own status for CVE-2026-64227 in every release this site tracks, and what each one means in practice. Every status below is the one the Debian Security Team publishes for this CVE. source

ReleaseStatus VersionWhat this means
Debian 12bookwormnot affected6.1.190-1Nothing to do. bookworm never shipped the vulnerable code.
Debian 13trixiefixedDSA-6405-1 · 2026-07-31 · text6.12.100-1Update the kernel and reboot. DSA-6405-1 shipped the fix on 2026-07-31, in 6.12.100-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian 14forkyfixed7.0.12-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 7.0.12-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian unstablesidfixed7.0.12-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 7.0.12-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian 12bookworm · linux-6.12fixedDLA-4724-1 · 2026-08-07 · text6.12.100-1~deb12u1Update the kernel and reboot. DLA-4724-1 shipped the fix on 2026-08-07, in 6.12.100-1~deb12u1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.

The vulnerability

What the bug is

Since every platform driver can be forced to match a device that doesn't match its list of device IDs because of device_match_driver_override(), platform drivers that rely on the existence of a device's ACPI companion object should verify its presence. Accordingly, add requisite ACPI_COMPANION() or ACPI_HANDLE() checks against NULL to 13 platform drivers handling core ACPI devices. Also change the value returned by the ACPI thermal zone driver when the device's ACPI companion is not present to -ENODEV for consistency with the other drivers.

Where it lives

The fix touches these files. If the subsystem is one you do not use, the practical exposure is lower, though the package is still the vulnerable one.

drivers/acpi/ac.c
drivers/acpi/acpi_pad.c
drivers/acpi/acpi_tad.c
drivers/acpi/battery.c
drivers/acpi/button.c
drivers/acpi/ec.c
drivers/acpi/hed.c
drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
drivers/acpi/pfr_telemetry.c
drivers/acpi/pfr_update.c
drivers/acpi/sbs.c
drivers/acpi/sbshc.c

What this is
ACPIMAINTAINERS section matched on drivers/acpi/ · linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org · Supported
Kernel module
ac

Check it on the machine

grep -wE 'CONFIG_ACPI|CONFIG_ACPI_AC' /boot/config-$(uname -r)

Reads the booted kernel's own configuration, on the machine and nowhere else. =y is built in, =m is a module, and an is not set line means the code is not there.

lsmod | grep -w ac

Prints a line if that module is loaded right now, and nothing if it is not. One that is not loaded can still be loaded later by anything that needs it.

Show whether Debian builds this, per release

Debian builds this, but not on every flavour. At least one release below builds the code on some of its kernel flavours and not on others, so the answer depends on the architecture and flavour installed.

  • bookwormBnot built on amd64/cloud-amd64, armhf/armmp, armhf/armmp-lpae, armhf/rt/armmp, ppc64el/powerpc64le
  • trixieBnot built on amd64/cloud-amd64, armel/rpi, armhf/armmp, armhf/armmp-lpae, armhf/rt/armmp, ppc64el/powerpc64le, ppc64el/powerpc64le-64k, s390x/s390x
  • forky, sidBnot built on amd64/cloud-amd64, armhf/armmp, armhf/armmp-lpae, ppc64el/powerpc64le, ppc64el/powerpc64le-64k, s390x/s390x
  • bookworm · linux-6.12Bnot built on amd64/cloud-amd64, armhf/armmp, armhf/armmp-lpae, armhf/rt/armmp, ppc64el/powerpc64le, ppc64el/powerpc64le-64k
B
built in on some, a module on others, absent on the rest
Build switches
CONFIG_ACPI, CONFIG_ACPI_AC
Reads as
all on means the file is compiled; any one off means it is not.

From the configuration Debian publishes for every kernel flavour it builds. It covers only the architectures Debian ships a linux-config package for, and nothing about a kernel you built yourself. Debian's own status above stays authoritative about the source package.MAINTAINERS kbuild Makefiles Debian linux-config packages

Signals

Published
2026-07-24 (3 months ago)source
CVSS
no vector published, unrated
Attack vector
not published
EPSS
0.16%, higher than 5.0% of all CVEssource
CISA KEV
not listedthe KEV catalogue
Debian urgency
unimportantsource
Subsystem
drivers/acpi

Upstream fixes

The versions the CNA records as introducing and fixing this, and the commit for each. source

IntroducedFixed inCommit
6.76.12.97a9451bf56123
6.76.18.4034f4d0e4e506
6.77.0.11612ddab8fce0
6.77.1e4865a56d013

Debian advisories

AdvisoryDateShipped toDebian
DLA-4724-12026-08-07bookworm 6.12.100-1~deb12u1tracker
DSA-6405-12026-07-31trixie 6.12.100-1tracker

Why the CNA scored it this way

The kernel CNA published no CVSS vector and no reasoning for CVE-2026-64227, which is why it is shown as unrated rather than given an invented score. 6,405 of the 20,413 CVEs here carry reasoning; this is not one of them.