Look up another CVE · open CVE-2026-64183 in the interactive tracker
CVE-2026-64183
efi: Allocate runtime workqueue before ACPI init
Published 2026-07-19 (3 months ago) by the Linux kernel CNA. Subsystem drivers/firmware. Debian urgency: unimportant.
What to do, per Debian release
Debian's own status for CVE-2026-64183 in every release this site tracks, and what each one means in practice. Every status below is the one the Debian Security Team publishes for this CVE. source
| Release | Status | Version | What this means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian 12bookworm | not affected | 6.1.190-1 | Nothing to do. bookworm never shipped the vulnerable code. |
| Debian 13trixie | fixed | 6.12.94-1 | Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 6.12.94-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts. |
| Debian 14forky | fixed | 7.0.12-1 | Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 7.0.12-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts. |
| Debian unstablesid | fixed | 7.0.12-1 | Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 7.0.12-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts. |
The vulnerability
What the bug is
Since commit 5894cf571e14 ("acpi/prmt: Use EFI runtime sandbox to invoke PRM handlers") ACPI PRM calls are delegated to a workqueue which runs in a kernel thread, making it easier to detect and mitigate faulting memory accesses performed by the firmware. Rafael reports that such PRM accesses may occur before efisubsys_init() executes, which is where the workqueue is allocated, leading to NULL pointer dereferences. Since acpi_init() [which triggers the early PRM accesses] executes as a subsys_initcall() as well, and has its own dependencies that may be sensitive to initcall ordering, deferring acpi_init() is not an option. So instead, split off the workqueue allocation into its own postcore initcall, as this is the only missing piece to allow EFI runtime calls to be made. This ensures that EFI runtime call (including PRM calls) are accessible to all code running at subsys_initcall() level.
Where it lives
The fix touches these files. If the subsystem is one you do not use, the practical exposure is lower, though the package is still the vulnerable one.
drivers/firmware/efi/efi.c
- What this is
- EXTENSIBLE FIRMWARE INTERFACE (EFI)MAINTAINERS section matched on drivers/firmware/efi/ · linux-efi@vger.kernel.org · Maintained
Check it on the machine
grep -w CONFIG_EFI /boot/config-$(uname -r)Reads the booted kernel's own configuration, on the machine and nowhere else. =y is built in, =m is a module, and an is not set line means the code is not there.
Show whether Debian builds this, per release
Debian builds this, but not on every flavour. At least one release below builds the code on some of its kernel flavours and not on others, so the answer depends on the architecture and flavour installed.
- bookwormYnot built on ppc64el/powerpc64le
- trixieYnot built on armel/rpi, ppc64el/powerpc64le, ppc64el/powerpc64le-64k, s390x/s390x
- forky, sidYnot built on ppc64el/powerpc64le, ppc64el/powerpc64le-64k, s390x/s390x
- Y
- built in where it is built at all; some flavours do not build it
- Build switch
- CONFIG_EFI
From the configuration Debian publishes for every kernel flavour it builds. It covers only the architectures Debian ships a linux-config package for, and nothing about a kernel you built yourself. Debian's own status above stays authoritative about the source package.MAINTAINERS kbuild Makefiles Debian linux-config packages
Signals
- Published
- 2026-07-19 (3 months ago)source
- CVSS
- no vector published, unrated
- Attack vector
- not published
- EPSS
- 0.12%, higher than 1.6% of all CVEssource
- CISA KEV
- not listedthe KEV catalogue
- Debian urgency
- unimportantsource
- Subsystem
- drivers/firmware
Upstream fixes
The versions the CNA records as introducing and fixing this, and the commit for each. source
| Introduced | Fixed in | Commit |
|---|---|---|
| 6.6 | 6.6.142 | 29cd94e678fc |
| 6.6 | 6.12.92 | 6996e954ae83 |
| 6.6 | 6.18.34 | c32a1fbe0f9a |
| 6.6 | 7.0.11 | e871549f7894 |
| 6.6 | 7.1 | 13c6da02e767 |
Why the CNA scored it this way
The kernel CNA published no CVSS vector and no reasoning for CVE-2026-64183, which is why it is shown as unrated rather than given an invented score. 6,405 of the 20,413 CVEs here carry reasoning; this is not one of them.