data built 2026-10-19T13:16:53Z

Look up another CVE · open CVE-2026-64182 in the interactive tracker

CVE-2026-64182

drivers/base/memory: fix memory block reference leak in poison accounting

EPSS 0.1%

Published 2026-07-19 (3 months ago) by the Linux kernel CNA. Subsystem drivers/base. Debian urgency: unimportant.

What to do, per Debian release

Debian's own status for CVE-2026-64182 in every release this site tracks, and what each one means in practice. Every status below is the one the Debian Security Team publishes for this CVE. source

ReleaseStatus VersionWhat this means
Debian 12bookwormnot affected6.1.190-1Nothing to do. bookworm never shipped the vulnerable code.
Debian 13trixiefixed6.12.94-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 6.12.94-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian 14forkyfixed7.0.12-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 7.0.12-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian unstablesidfixed7.0.12-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 7.0.12-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.

The vulnerability

What the bug is

memblk_nr_poison_inc() and memblk_nr_poison_sub() look up a memory block via find_memory_block_by_id(), which acquires a reference to the memory block device. Both helpers use the returned memory block without dropping that reference, leaking the device reference on each successful lookup. Drop the reference after updating nr_hwpoison.

Where it lives

The fix touches these files. If the subsystem is one you do not use, the practical exposure is lower, though the package is still the vulnerable one.

drivers/base/memory.c

What this is
MEMORY HOT(UN)PLUGMAINTAINERS section matched on drivers/base/memory.c · linux-mm@kvack.org · Maintained

Check it on the machine

grep -w CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG /boot/config-$(uname -r)

Reads the booted kernel's own configuration, on the machine and nowhere else. =y is built in, =m is a module, and an is not set line means the code is not there.

Show whether Debian builds this, per release

Debian builds this, but not on every flavour. At least one release below builds the code on some of its kernel flavours and not on others, so the answer depends on the architecture and flavour installed.

  • bookwormYnot built on armhf/armmp, armhf/armmp-lpae, armhf/rt/armmp, i386/686, i386/686-pae, i386/rt/686-pae
  • trixieYnot built on armel/rpi, armhf/armmp, armhf/armmp-lpae, armhf/rt/armmp
  • forky, sidYnot built on armhf/armmp, armhf/armmp-lpae
Y
built in where it is built at all; some flavours do not build it
Build switch
CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG

From the configuration Debian publishes for every kernel flavour it builds. It covers only the architectures Debian ships a linux-config package for, and nothing about a kernel you built yourself. Debian's own status above stays authoritative about the source package.MAINTAINERS kbuild Makefiles Debian linux-config packages

Signals

Published
2026-07-19 (3 months ago)source
CVSS
no vector published, unrated
Attack vector
not published
EPSS
0.11%, higher than 1.4% of all CVEssource
CISA KEV
not listedthe KEV catalogue
Debian urgency
unimportantsource
Subsystem
drivers/base

Upstream fixes

The versions the CNA records as introducing and fixing this, and the commit for each. source

IntroducedFixed inCommit
6.26.6.142686b4283f82c
6.26.12.92ce60d9452a0f
6.26.18.3424840b3139d7
6.27.0.118502e2c2d063
6.27.103a2cc1756a0

Why the CNA scored it this way

The kernel CNA published no CVSS vector and no reasoning for CVE-2026-64182, which is why it is shown as unrated rather than given an invented score. 6,405 of the 20,413 CVEs here carry reasoning; this is not one of them.