data built 2026-10-19T13:16:53Z

Look up another CVE · open CVE-2026-63842 in the interactive tracker

CVE-2026-63842

drm/amdgpu/jpeg: set no_user_fence for JPEG v5.0.0 ring

7.8 EPSS 0.2% AV:L

Published 2026-07-19 (3 months ago) by the Linux kernel CNA. Subsystem drivers/gpu. Debian urgency: unimportant.

What to do, per Debian release

Debian's own status for CVE-2026-63842 in every release this site tracks, and what each one means in practice. Every status below is the one the Debian Security Team publishes for this CVE. source

ReleaseStatus VersionWhat this means
Debian 12bookwormnot affected6.1.190-1Nothing to do. bookworm never shipped the vulnerable code.
Debian 13trixiefixed6.12.94-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 6.12.94-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian 14forkyfixed7.0.10-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 7.0.10-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian unstablesidfixed7.0.10-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 7.0.10-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.

The vulnerability

What the bug is

JPEG rings do not support 64-bit user fence writes, reject CS submissions with user fences. (cherry picked from commit 0f43893d3cd478fa57836697525b338817c9c23d)

Where it lives

The fix touches these files. If the subsystem is one you do not use, the practical exposure is lower, though the package is still the vulnerable one.

drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/jpeg_v5_0_0.c

What this is
RADEON and AMDGPU DRM DRIVERSMAINTAINERS section matched on drivers/gpu/drm/amd/ · amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org · Supported
Kernel module
amdgpu

Check it on the machine

grep -w CONFIG_DRM_AMDGPU /boot/config-$(uname -r)

Reads the booted kernel's own configuration, on the machine and nowhere else. =y is built in, =m is a module, and an is not set line means the code is not there.

lsmod | grep -w amdgpu

Prints a line if that module is loaded right now, and nothing if it is not. One that is not loaded can still be loaded later by anything that needs it.

Show whether Debian builds this, per release

Debian builds this, but not on every flavour. At least one release below builds the code on some of its kernel flavours and not on others, so the answer depends on the architecture and flavour installed. The build rule could not be established for 1 release, so nothing is claimed about those.

  • bookworm?
  • trixieMnot built on amd64/cloud-amd64, arm64/cloud-arm64, armel/rpi, armhf/armmp, armhf/armmp-lpae, armhf/rt/armmp, s390x/s390x
  • forky, sidMnot built on amd64/cloud-amd64, arm64/cloud-arm64, s390x/s390x
?
not established - no Makefile entry for the affected file
M
a module where it is built at all; some flavours do not build it

Where a release above reads "not established", no build rule for the affected file was found in that release's kernel tree. That is a gap in this lookup, not a finding that the code is absent.

Build switch
CONFIG_DRM_AMDGPU

From the configuration Debian publishes for every kernel flavour it builds. It covers only the architectures Debian ships a linux-config package for, and nothing about a kernel you built yourself. Debian's own status above stays authoritative about the source package.MAINTAINERS kbuild Makefiles Debian linux-config packages

Signals

Published
2026-07-19 (3 months ago)source
CVSS
7.8 high
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Hsource recompute it
Attack vector
local (AV:L)source
EPSS
0.18%, higher than 6.6% of all CVEssource
CISA KEV
not listedthe KEV catalogue
Debian urgency
unimportantsource
Subsystem
drivers/gpu

Upstream fixes

The versions the CNA records as introducing and fixing this, and the commit for each. source

IntroducedFixed inCommit
6.96.12.913a55ff19a6ff
6.96.18.33a7e63bb93a7f
6.97.0.1069ab75c7c5f3
6.97.1ea7c61c5f895

Why the CNA scored it this way

Quoted from the kernel CNA's own scoring file, word for word. A highlighted metric carries the most severe value CVSS v3.1 defines for it, which is what pushes the score up. source

AV:LAttack vector, local
Exploitation requires submitting AMDGPU command buffers via DRM_IOCTL_AMDGPU_CS on a local /dev/dri/renderD* device; the JPEG ring is not reachable over the network.
AC:LAttack complexity, low
An attacker with render-node access can deterministically submit a CS with an AMDGPU_CHUNK_ID_FENCE chunk and a JPEG-ring IB (AMDGPU_HW_IP_VCN_JPEG); no race or external timing is required.
PR:LPrivileges required, low
The amdgpu_cs_ioctl path is gated by DRM_AUTH|DRM_RENDER_ALLOW, reachable by unprivileged local users with standard render-node access (render group membership), not root.
UI:NUser interaction, none
No victim interaction is required; the attacker triggers the malformed user-fence write through their own ioctl submission.
S:UScope, unchanged
Impact is confined to GPU memory writes within the attacker's amdgpu VM context; this is standard local privilege/resource abuse, not a VM escape or cross-authority boundary crossing.
C:HConfidentiality impact, high
The JPEG engine performs an unsupported 64-bit fence memory write (via jpeg_v4_0_3_dec_ring_emit_fence with AMDGPU_FENCE_FLAG_64BIT), causing GPU memory corruption that can be leveraged for arbitrary read primitives within the attacker's GPU address space.
I:HIntegrity impact, high
The malformed hardware fence write can corrupt arbitrary GPU-mapped buffers in the submitter's VM, providing a write primitive that could be developed into GPU code execution or further kernel compromise.
A:HAvailability impact, high
Incorrect fence handling can hang or reset the GPU (affecting all users of the device) and may trigger kernel GPU driver recovery paths, causing denial of service.