data built 2026-10-19T13:16:53Z

Look up another CVE · open CVE-2026-53370 in the interactive tracker

CVE-2026-53370

perf/x86/intel: Improve validation and configuration of ACR masks

EPSS 0.2%

Published 2026-07-19 (3 months ago) by the Linux kernel CNA. Subsystem arch/x86. Debian urgency: unimportant.

What to do, per Debian release

Debian's own status for CVE-2026-53370 in every release this site tracks, and what each one means in practice. Every status below is the one the Debian Security Team publishes for this CVE. source

ReleaseStatus VersionWhat this means
Debian 12bookwormnot affected6.1.190-1Nothing to do. bookworm never shipped the vulnerable code.
Debian 13trixienot affected6.12.113-1Nothing to do. trixie never shipped the vulnerable code.
Debian 14forkyfixed7.0.7-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 7.0.7-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian unstablesidfixed7.0.7-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 7.0.7-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.

The vulnerability

What the bug is

Currently there are several issues on the user space ACR mask validation and configuration. - The validation for user space ACR mask (attr.config2) is incomplete, e.g., the ACR mask could include the index which belongs to another ACR events group, but it's not validated. - An early return on an invalid ACR mask caused all subsequent ACR groups to be skipped. - The stale hardware ACR mask (hw.config1) is not cleared before setting new hardware ACR mask. The following changes address all of the above issues. - Figure out the event index group of an ACR group. Any bits in the user-space mask not present in the index group are now dropped. - Instead of an early return on invalid bits, drop only the invalid portions and continue iterating through all ACR events to ensure full configuration. - Explicitly clear the stale hardware ACR mask for each event prior to writing the new configuration. Besides, a non-leader event member of ACR group could be disabled in theory. This could cause bit-shifting errors in the acr_mask of remaining group members. But since ACR sampling requires all events to be active, this should not be a big concern in real use case. Add a "FIXME" comment to notice this risk.

Where it lives

The fix touches these files. If the subsystem is one you do not use, the practical exposure is lower, though the package is still the vulnerable one.

arch/x86/events/intel/core.c

What this is
PERFORMANCE EVENTS SUBSYSTEMMAINTAINERS section matched on arch/*/events/*/* · linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org · Supported

Check it on the machine

grep -wE 'CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL|CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS' /boot/config-$(uname -r)

Reads the booted kernel's own configuration, on the machine and nowhere else. =y is built in, =m is a module, and an is not set line means the code is not there.

Show whether Debian builds this, per release

Debian builds this, but not on every flavour. At least one release below builds the code on some of its kernel flavours and not on others, so the answer depends on the architecture and flavour installed.

  • bookwormYnot built on arm64/arm64, arm64/cloud-arm64, arm64/rt/arm64, armhf/armmp, armhf/armmp-lpae, armhf/rt/armmp, ppc64el/powerpc64le
  • trixieYnot built on arm64/arm64, arm64/arm64-16k, arm64/cloud-arm64, arm64/rt/arm64, armel/rpi, armhf/armmp, armhf/armmp-lpae, armhf/rt/armmp, ppc64el/powerpc64le, ppc64el/powerpc64le-64k, riscv64/riscv64, s390x/s390x
  • forky, sidYnot built on arm64/arm64, arm64/arm64-16k, arm64/cloud-arm64, arm64/rt-arm64, armhf/armmp, armhf/armmp-lpae, loong64/loong64, ppc64el/powerpc64le, ppc64el/powerpc64le-64k, riscv64/riscv64, s390x/s390x
Y
built in where it is built at all; some flavours do not build it
Build switches
CONFIG_CPU_SUP_INTEL, CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
Reads as
all on means the file is compiled; any one off means it is not.

From the configuration Debian publishes for every kernel flavour it builds. It covers only the architectures Debian ships a linux-config package for, and nothing about a kernel you built yourself. Debian's own status above stays authoritative about the source package.MAINTAINERS kbuild Makefiles Debian linux-config packages

Signals

Published
2026-07-19 (3 months ago)source
CVSS
no vector published, unrated
Attack vector
not published
EPSS
0.16%, higher than 4.8% of all CVEssource
CISA KEV
not listedthe KEV catalogue
Debian urgency
unimportantsource
Subsystem
arch/x86

Upstream fixes

The versions the CNA records as introducing and fixing this, and the commit for each. source

IntroducedFixed inCommit
6.166.18.30aab56b95bee3
6.167.0.7c05e01cef47d
6.167.15ad732a56be4

Why the CNA scored it this way

The kernel CNA published no CVSS vector and no reasoning for CVE-2026-53370, which is why it is shown as unrated rather than given an invented score. 6,405 of the 20,413 CVEs here carry reasoning; this is not one of them.