Look up another CVE · open CVE-2026-53284 in the interactive tracker

CVE-2026-53284

btrfs: only release the dirty pages io tree after successful writes

7.5 EPSS 0.4% AV:N

Published 2026-06-26 (4 months ago) by the Linux kernel CNA. Subsystem fs/btrfs. Debian urgency: not yet assigned.

What to do, per Debian release

Debian's own status for CVE-2026-53284 in every release this site tracks, and what each one means in practice. Every status below is the one the Debian Security Team publishes for this CVE. source

Release	Status	Version	What this means
Debian 12bookworm	vulnerable	6.1.190-1	No fix published anywhere yet, neither in Debian nor upstream for the series bookworm tracks. Watch the Debian tracker page for this CVE. Advisories for bookworm have historically landed a median of 23 days after publication.
Debian 13trixie	vulnerable	6.12.113-1	No fix published anywhere yet, neither in Debian nor upstream for the series trixie tracks. Watch the Debian tracker page for this CVE. Advisories for trixie have historically landed a median of 11 days after publication.
Debian 14forky	fixed	7.0.10-1	Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 7.0.10-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian unstablesid	fixed	7.0.10-1	Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 7.0.10-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.

The vulnerability

What the bug is

[WARNING] With extra warning on dirty extent buffers at umount (aka, the next patch in the series), test case generic/388 can trigger the following warning about dirty extent buffers at unmount time: BTRFS critical (device dm-2 state E): emergency shutdown BTRFS error (device dm-2 state E): error while writing out transaction: -30 BTRFS warning (device dm-2 state E): Skipping commit of aborted transaction. BTRFS error (device dm-2 state EA): Transaction 9 aborted (error -30) BTRFS: error (device dm-2 state EA) in cleanup_transaction:2068: errno=-30 Readonly filesystem BTRFS info (device dm-2 state EA): forced readonly BTRFS info (device dm-2 state EA): last unmount of filesystem 4fbf2e15-f941-49a0-bc7c-716315d2777c ------------[ cut here ]------------ WARNING: disk-io.c:3311 at invalidate_and_check_btree_folios+0xfd/0x1ca [btrfs], CPU#8: umount/914368 CPU: 8 UID: 0 PID: 914368 Comm: umount Tainted: G OE 7.1.0-rc1-custom+ #372 PREEMPT(full) 2de38db8d1deae71fde295430a0ff3ab98ccf596 Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS unknown 02/02/2022 RIP: 0010:invalidate_and_check_btree_folios+0xfd/0x1ca [btrfs] Call Trace: <TASK> close_ctree+0x52e/0x574 [btrfs d2f0b1cd330d1287e7a9919d112eadfc0e914efd] generic_shutdown_super+0x89/0x1a0 kill_anon_super+0x16/0x40 btrfs_kill_super+0x16/0x20 [btrfs d2f0b1cd330d1287e7a9919d112eadfc0e914efd] deactivate_locked_super+0x2d/0xb0 cleanup_mnt+0xdc/0x140 task_work_run+0x5a/0xa0 exit_to_user_mode_loop+0x123/0x4b0 do_syscall_64+0x243/0x7c0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 </TASK> ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- BTRFS warning (device dm-2 state EA): unable to release extent buffer 30539776 owner 9 gen 9 refs 2 flags 0x7 BTRFS warning (device dm-2 state EA): unable to release extent buffer 30621696 owner 257 gen 9 refs 2 flags 0x7 BTRFS warning (device dm-2 state EA): unable to release extent buffer 30638080 owner 258 gen 9 refs 2 flags 0x7 BTRFS warning (device dm-2 state EA): unable to release extent buffer 30654464 owner 7 gen 9 refs 2 flags 0x7 BTRFS warning (device dm-2 state EA): unable to release extent buffer 30703616 owner 2 gen 9 refs 2 flags 0x7 BTRFS warning (device dm-2 state EA): unable to release extent buffer 30720000 owner 10 gen 9 refs 2 flags 0x7 BTRFS warning (device dm-2 state EA): unable to release extent buffer 30736384 owner 4 gen 9 refs 2 flags 0x7 BTRFS warning (device dm-2 state EA): unable to release extent buffer 30752768 owner 11 gen 9 refs 2 flags 0x7 I'm using a stripped down version, which seems to trigger the warning more reliably: _fsstress_pid="" workload() { dmesg -C mkfs.btrfs -f -K $dev > /dev/null echo 1 > /sys/kernel/debug/clear_warn_once mount $dev $mnt $fsstress -w -n 1024 -p 4 -d $mnt & _fsstress_pid=$! sleep 0 $godown $mnt pkill --echo -PIPE fsstress > /dev/null wait $_fsstress_pid unset _fsstress_pid umount $mnt if dmesg | grep -q "WARNING"; then fail fi } for (( i = 0; i < $runtime; i++ )); do echo "=== $i/$runtime ===" workload done [CAUSE] Inside btrfs_write_and_wait_transaction(), we first try to write all dirty ebs, then wait for them to finish. After that we call btrfs_extent_io_tree_release() to free all extent states from dirty_pages io tree. However if we hit an error from btrfs_write_marked_extent(), then we still call btrfs_extent_io_tree_release() to clear that dirty_pages io tree, which may contain dirty records that we haven't yet submitted. Furthermore, the later transaction cleanup path will utilize that dirty_pages io tree to properly cleanup those dirty ebs, but since it's already empty, no dirty ebs are properly cleaned up, thus will later trigger the warnings inside invalidate_btree_folios(). ---truncated---

Where it lives

The fix touches these files. If the subsystem is one you do not use, the practical exposure is lower, though the package is still the vulnerable one.

fs/btrfs/disk-io.c
fs/btrfs/transaction.c

What this is: BTRFS FILE SYSTEMMAINTAINERS section matched on fs/btrfs/ · linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org · Maintained
Kernel module: btrfs

Check it on the machine

grep -w CONFIG_BTRFS_FS /boot/config-$(uname -r)

Reads the booted kernel's own configuration, on the machine and nowhere else. =y is built in, =m is a module, and an is not set line means the code is not there.

lsmod | grep -w btrfs

Prints a line if that module is loaded right now, and nothing if it is not. One that is not loaded can still be loaded later by anything that needs it.

Show whether Debian builds this, per release

Debian builds this as a loadable module. Every release below compiles it as a module on every flavour, so whether the code is in the running kernel depends on whether that module is loaded.

bookworm, trixie, forky, sidm

m: a loadable module on every flavour - check lsmod, can be blacklisted

Build switch: CONFIG_BTRFS_FS

From the configuration Debian publishes for every kernel flavour it builds. It covers only the architectures Debian ships a linux-config package for, and nothing about a kernel you built yourself. Debian's own status above stays authoritative about the source package.MAINTAINERS kbuild Makefiles Debian linux-config packages

Debian tracker CVE record NVD kernel CNA record

Signals

Published: 2026-06-26 (4 months ago)source
CVSS: 7.5 high
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:Hsource recompute it
Attack vector: network (AV:N)source
EPSS: 0.43%, higher than 35.4% of all CVEssource
CISA KEV: not listedthe KEV catalogue
Debian urgency: not yet assignedsource
Subsystem: fs/btrfs

Upstream fixes

The versions the CNA records as introducing and fixing this, and the commit for each. source

Introduced	Fixed in	Commit
3.19	6.18.33	9ebb7eba1237
3.19	7.0.10	df03d67dc637
3.19	7.1	4066c55e1094

Why the CNA scored it this way

Quoted from the kernel CNA's own scoring file, word for word. A highlighted metric carries the most severe value CVSS v3.1 defines for it, which is what pushes the score up. source

AV:NAttack vector, network: A writable Btrfs filesystem can be driven remotely when exported through kernel network file services such as nfsd or ksmbd, whose COMMIT/FLUSH/write-sync paths call VFS fsync and reach Btrfs transaction commit. This is a reasonable high-impact deployment for Btrfs-backed NAS or server shares.
AC:LAttack complexity, low: The attacker can create dirty Btrfs metadata and force commits/syncs through normal file operations; in the highest reasonable scenario, storage/writeback failure can be induced by exhausting thin or shared backing storage. No race or precise memory layout is required.
PR:NPrivileges required, none: There is no Btrfs capability check on the vulnerable transaction writeback path, and a remotely writable NFS/SMB export can expose it without local kernel privileges. Choosing the higher-severity case, an accessible writable export/guest-style share requires no privileges on the target host.
UI:NUser interaction, none: Exploitation is driven by attacker-controlled file operations and sync/flush requests. No victim user action is required beyond the system already serving or mounting the Btrfs filesystem.
S:UScope, unchanged: The impact remains within the kernel/filesystem security authority. It does not cross a VM, IOMMU, or sandbox boundary.
C:NConfidentiality impact, none: The bug prematurely drops dirty extent tracking and prevents proper cleanup; it is not a use-after-free, out-of-bounds read, or information disclosure primitive. The investigated impact does not expose kernel or filesystem data to the attacker.
I:NIntegrity impact, none: The defect does not provide an arbitrary write or controlled data modification primitive. Any failed or late metadata write is part of transaction abort/cleanup behavior rather than attacker-controlled integrity compromise.
A:HAvailability impact, high: Leftover dirty extent buffers can later be written back during teardown after workers are stopped, leading to NULL pointer dereferences or kernel warnings/panic conditions. This can crash the kernel or make the filesystem unavailable.