Look up another CVE · open CVE-2026-53092 in the interactive tracker
CVE-2026-53092
bpf: Fix linked reg delta tracking when src_reg == dst_reg
Published 2026-06-24 (4 months ago) by the Linux kernel CNA. Subsystem kernel/bpf. Debian urgency: unimportant.
What to do, per Debian release
Debian's own status for CVE-2026-53092 in every release this site tracks, and what each one means in practice. Every status below is the one the Debian Security Team publishes for this CVE. source
| Release | Status | Version | What this means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Debian 12bookworm | not affected | 6.1.190-1 | Nothing to do. bookworm never shipped the vulnerable code. |
| Debian 13trixie | fixedDSA-6466-1 · 2026-08-25 · text | 6.12.105-1 | Update the kernel and reboot. DSA-6466-1 shipped the fix on 2026-08-25, in 6.12.105-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts. |
| Debian 14forky | fixed | 7.0.10-1 | Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 7.0.10-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts. |
| Debian unstablesid | fixed | 7.0.10-1 | Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 7.0.10-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts. |
| Debian 12bookworm · linux-6.12 | fixedDLA-4788-1 · 2026-09-19 · text | 6.12.107-1~deb12u1 | Update the kernel and reboot. DLA-4788-1 shipped the fix on 2026-09-19, in 6.12.107-1~deb12u1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts. |
The vulnerability
What the bug is
Consider the case of rX += rX where src_reg and dst_reg are pointers to the same bpf_reg_state in adjust_reg_min_max_vals(). The latter first modifies the dst_reg in-place, and later in the delta tracking, the subsequent is_reg_const(src_reg)/reg_const_value(src_reg) reads the post-{add,sub} value instead of the original source. This is problematic since it sets an incorrect delta, which sync_linked_regs() then propagates to linked registers, thus creating a verifier-vs-runtime mismatch. Fix it by just skipping this corner case.
Where it lives
The fix touches these files. If the subsystem is one you do not use, the practical exposure is lower, though the package is still the vulnerable one.
kernel/bpf/verifier.c
- What this is
- BPF [CORE]MAINTAINERS section matched on kernel/bpf/verifier.c · bpf@vger.kernel.org · Maintained
Check it on the machine
grep -wE 'CONFIG_BPF|CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL' /boot/config-$(uname -r)Reads the booted kernel's own configuration, on the machine and nowhere else. =y is built in, =m is a module, and an is not set line means the code is not there.
Show whether Debian builds this, per release
Debian builds this code. Every release below compiles the affected file into the kernels it ships.
- bookworm, trixie, forky, sid, bookworm · linux-6.12y
- y
- built into the kernel image on every flavour - only a patch removes it
- Build switches
- CONFIG_BPF, CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
- Reads as
- all on means the file is compiled; any one off means it is not.
From the configuration Debian publishes for every kernel flavour it builds. It covers only the architectures Debian ships a linux-config package for, and nothing about a kernel you built yourself. Debian's own status above stays authoritative about the source package.MAINTAINERS kbuild Makefiles Debian linux-config packages
Signals
- Published
- 2026-06-24 (4 months ago)source
- CVSS
- 7.8 high
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Hsource recompute it - Attack vector
- local (AV:L)source
- EPSS
- 0.13%, higher than 2.4% of all CVEssource
- CISA KEV
- not listedthe KEV catalogue
- Debian urgency
- unimportantsource
- Subsystem
- kernel/bpf
Upstream fixes
The versions the CNA records as introducing and fixing this, and the commit for each. source
| Introduced | Fixed in | Commit |
|---|---|---|
| 6.11 | 6.12.105 | 1509c1ae9185 |
| 6.11 | 6.18.33 | d88e8e4a3b52 |
| 6.11 | 7.0.10 | cc86a8b0a1c5 |
| 6.11 | 7.1 | d7f14173c0d5 |
Debian advisories
| Advisory | Date | Shipped to | Debian |
|---|---|---|---|
| DLA-4788-1 | 2026-09-19 | bookworm 6.12.107-1~deb12u1 | tracker |
| DSA-6466-1 | 2026-08-25 | trixie 6.12.105-1 | tracker |
Why the CNA scored it this way
Quoted from the kernel CNA's own scoring file, word for word. A highlighted metric carries the most severe value CVSS v3.1 defines for it, which is what pushes the score up. source
- AV:LAttack vector, local
- The vulnerable code is reached through the local `bpf(BPF_PROG_LOAD)` syscall while verifying attacker-supplied BPF instructions, not through network or physical input.
- AC:LAttack complexity, low
- The attacker controls the BPF instruction stream and can construct the linked-register `src_reg == dst_reg` sequence; there is no race or external state requirement beyond passing the verifier path.
- PR:LPrivileges required, low
- The affected verifier logic is gated by `CAP_BPF`, but it is also reachable through delegated BPF tokens with namespaced `CAP_BPF`; under the required higher-severity choice this is Low rather than High.
- UI:NUser interaction, none
- No victim action is needed after the attacker can invoke `bpf(BPF_PROG_LOAD)` with the crafted program.
- S:UScope, unchanged
- The impact is within the same kernel security authority; this is a standard local kernel privilege escalation/verifier bypass rather than a VM or IOMMU boundary crossing.
- C:HConfidentiality impact, high
- The bug creates a verifier-versus-runtime bounds mismatch, which can allow accepted BPF programs to perform out-of-bounds reads and develop arbitrary kernel memory disclosure primitives.
- I:HIntegrity impact, high
- Incorrect verifier bounds can allow out-of-bounds writes through map or memory accesses after program load, making arbitrary kernel memory modification and privilege escalation defensible.
- A:HAvailability impact, high
- Even if not fully weaponized for read/write primitives, an accepted unsafe BPF program can corrupt kernel memory or trigger an oops/panic, causing high availability impact.