data built 2026-10-19T13:16:53Z

Look up another CVE · open CVE-2026-53075 in the interactive tracker

CVE-2026-53075

ppp: require CAP_NET_ADMIN in target netns for unattached ioctls

8.8 EPSS 0.2% AV:L

Published 2026-06-24 (4 months ago) by the Linux kernel CNA. Subsystem drivers/net. Debian urgency: not yet assigned.

What to do, per Debian release

Debian's own status for CVE-2026-53075 in every release this site tracks, and what each one means in practice. Every status below is the one the Debian Security Team publishes for this CVE. source

ReleaseStatus VersionWhat this means
Debian 12bookwormfixedDLA-4665-1 · 2026-07-03 · text6.1.176-1Update the kernel and reboot. DLA-4665-1 shipped the fix on 2026-07-03, in 6.1.176-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian 13trixiefixed6.12.94-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 6.12.94-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian 14forkyfixed7.0.10-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 7.0.10-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian unstablesidfixed7.0.10-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 7.0.10-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.

The vulnerability

What the bug is

/dev/ppp open is currently authorized against file->f_cred->user_ns, while unattached administrative ioctls operate on current->nsproxy->net_ns. As a result, a local unprivileged user can create a new user namespace with CLONE_NEWUSER, gain CAP_NET_ADMIN only in that new user namespace, and still issue PPPIOCNEWUNIT, PPPIOCATTACH, or PPPIOCATTCHAN against an inherited network namespace. Require CAP_NET_ADMIN in the user namespace that owns the target network namespace before handling unattached PPP administrative ioctls. This preserves normal pppd operation in the network namespace it is actually privileged in, while rejecting the userns-only inherited-netns case.

Where it lives

The fix touches these files. If the subsystem is one you do not use, the practical exposure is lower, though the package is still the vulnerable one.

drivers/net/ppp/ppp_generic.c

What this is
PPP PROTOCOL DRIVERS AND COMPRESSORSMAINTAINERS section matched on drivers/net/ppp/ppp_* · linux-ppp@vger.kernel.org · Orphan
Kernel module
ppp_generic

Check it on the machine

grep -wE 'CONFIG_PPP|CONFIG_PPPOE|CONFIG_PPPOL2TP|CONFIG_PPP_ASYNC|CONFIG_PPP_BSDCOMP|CONFIG_PPP_DEFLATE|CONFIG_PPP_MPPE|CONFIG_PPP_SYNC_TTY|CONFIG_PPTP' /boot/config-$(uname -r)

Reads the booted kernel's own configuration, on the machine and nowhere else. =y is built in, =m is a module, and an is not set line means the code is not there.

lsmod | grep -w ppp_generic

Prints a line if that module is loaded right now, and nothing if it is not. One that is not loaded can still be loaded later by anything that needs it.

Show whether Debian builds this, per release

Debian builds this, but not on every flavour. At least one release below builds the code on some of its kernel flavours and not on others, so the answer depends on the architecture and flavour installed.

  • bookwormMnot built on amd64/cloud-amd64, arm64/cloud-arm64
  • trixieMnot built on amd64/cloud-amd64, arm64/cloud-arm64, s390x/s390x
  • forky, sidMnot built on amd64/cloud-amd64, arm64/cloud-arm64
M
a module where it is built at all; some flavours do not build it
Build switches
CONFIG_PPP, CONFIG_PPPOE, CONFIG_PPPOL2TP, CONFIG_PPP_ASYNC, CONFIG_PPP_BSDCOMP, CONFIG_PPP_DEFLATE, CONFIG_PPP_MPPE, CONFIG_PPP_SYNC_TTY, CONFIG_PPTP
Reads as
all on means the file is compiled; any one off means it is not.

From the configuration Debian publishes for every kernel flavour it builds. It covers only the architectures Debian ships a linux-config package for, and nothing about a kernel you built yourself. Debian's own status above stays authoritative about the source package.MAINTAINERS kbuild Makefiles Debian linux-config packages

Signals

Published
2026-06-24 (4 months ago)source
CVSS
8.8 high
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:Hsource recompute it
Attack vector
local (AV:L)source
EPSS
0.25%, higher than 15.2% of all CVEssource
CISA KEV
not listedthe KEV catalogue
Debian urgency
not yet assignedsource
Subsystem
drivers/net

Upstream fixes

The versions the CNA records as introducing and fixing this, and the commit for each. source

IntroducedFixed inCommit
2.6.305.10.258c9edd90c57ae
2.6.305.15.2095080e188c914
2.6.306.1.17567e901e28d17
2.6.306.6.141954745d0223e
2.6.306.12.913b2c2157dc2a
2.6.306.18.335013be175c7f
2.6.307.0.101a8a51ce8507
2.6.307.12bb6379416fd

Debian advisories

AdvisoryDateShipped toDebian
DLA-4671-12026-07-05bullseye 6.1.176-1~deb11u1tracker
DLA-4665-12026-07-03bookworm 6.1.176-1tracker
DLA-4664-12026-07-03bullseye 5.10.259-1tracker

Why the CNA scored it this way

Quoted from the kernel CNA's own scoring file, word for word. A highlighted metric carries the most severe value CVSS v3.1 defines for it, which is what pushes the score up. source

AV:LAttack vector, local
The vulnerable PPP administrative ioctls are reached locally through `/dev/ppp` and the `ioctl` syscall, not by remote packets.
AC:LAttack complexity, low
An attacker can deterministically create a user namespace, open `/dev/ppp`, and issue the unattached ioctls against the inherited target network namespace; no race or external condition is required.
PR:LPrivileges required, low
A basic unprivileged local user can gain `CAP_NET_ADMIN` only inside a new user namespace and abuse the pre-fix check, so this does not require real root or host `CAP_NET_ADMIN`.
UI:NUser interaction, none
No victim action is required after the attacker has local code execution; the attacker directly invokes the namespace and ioctl operations.
S:CScope, changed
The bug crosses the user-namespace capability boundary by allowing capabilities in one user namespace to administer PPP resources in a network namespace owned by another user namespace.
C:HConfidentiality impact, high
By attaching to existing PPP units or channels, an attacker can read PPP control/authentication traffic and can plausibly expose sensitive PPP-session data in affected deployments.
I:HIntegrity impact, high
The attacker can create PPP interfaces, attach to units/channels, alter PPP parameters, and inject or redirect PPP frames in a network namespace they should not administer.
A:HAvailability impact, high
The attacker can disrupt PPP connectivity by changing interface/channel state, disconnecting or bridging channels, or exhausting PPP resources, causing loss of network availability in PPP-dependent systems.