data built 2026-10-19T13:16:53Z

Look up another CVE · open CVE-2026-53053 in the interactive tracker

CVE-2026-53053

iommu/amd: Fix clone_alias() to use the original device's devid

8.8 EPSS 0.1% AV:L

Published 2026-06-24 (4 months ago) by the Linux kernel CNA. Subsystem drivers/iommu. Debian urgency: not yet assigned.

What to do, per Debian release

Debian's own status for CVE-2026-53053 in every release this site tracks, and what each one means in practice. Every status below is the one the Debian Security Team publishes for this CVE. source

ReleaseStatus VersionWhat this means
Debian 12bookwormvulnerable6.1.190-1No fix published anywhere yet, neither in Debian nor upstream for the series bookworm tracks. Watch the Debian tracker page for this CVE. Advisories for bookworm have historically landed a median of 23 days after publication.
Debian 13trixiefixed6.12.94-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 6.12.94-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian 14forkyfixed7.0.10-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 7.0.10-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian unstablesidfixed7.0.10-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 7.0.10-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.

The vulnerability

What the bug is

Currently clone_alias() assumes first argument (pdev) is always the original device pointer. This function is called by pci_for_each_dma_alias() which based on topology decides to send original or alias device details in first argument. This meant that the source devid used to look up and copy the DTE may be incorrect, leading to wrong or stale DTE entries being propagated to alias device. Fix this by passing the original pdev as the opaque data argument to both the direct clone_alias() call and pci_for_each_dma_alias(). Inside clone_alias(), retrieve the original device from data and compute devid from it.

Where it lives

The fix touches these files. If the subsystem is one you do not use, the practical exposure is lower, though the package is still the vulnerable one.

drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c

What this is
AMD IOMMU (AMD-VI)MAINTAINERS section matched on drivers/iommu/amd/ · iommu@lists.linux.dev · Maintained

Check it on the machine

grep -w CONFIG_AMD_IOMMU /boot/config-$(uname -r)

Reads the booted kernel's own configuration, on the machine and nowhere else. =y is built in, =m is a module, and an is not set line means the code is not there.

Show whether Debian builds this, per release

Debian builds this, but not on every flavour. At least one release below builds the code on some of its kernel flavours and not on others, so the answer depends on the architecture and flavour installed.

  • bookwormYnot built on amd64/cloud-amd64, arm64/arm64, arm64/cloud-arm64, arm64/rt/arm64, armhf/armmp, armhf/armmp-lpae, armhf/rt/armmp, i386/686, i386/686-pae, i386/rt/686-pae, ppc64el/powerpc64le
  • trixieYnot built on amd64/cloud-amd64, arm64/arm64, arm64/arm64-16k, arm64/cloud-arm64, arm64/rt/arm64, armel/rpi, armhf/armmp, armhf/armmp-lpae, armhf/rt/armmp, ppc64el/powerpc64le, ppc64el/powerpc64le-64k, riscv64/riscv64, s390x/s390x
  • forky, sidYnot built on amd64/cloud-amd64, arm64/arm64, arm64/arm64-16k, arm64/cloud-arm64, arm64/rt-arm64, armhf/armmp, armhf/armmp-lpae, loong64/loong64, ppc64el/powerpc64le, ppc64el/powerpc64le-64k, riscv64/riscv64, s390x/s390x
Y
built in where it is built at all; some flavours do not build it
Build switch
CONFIG_AMD_IOMMU

From the configuration Debian publishes for every kernel flavour it builds. It covers only the architectures Debian ships a linux-config package for, and nothing about a kernel you built yourself. Debian's own status above stays authoritative about the source package.MAINTAINERS kbuild Makefiles Debian linux-config packages

Signals

Published
2026-06-24 (4 months ago)source
CVSS
8.8 high
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:Hsource recompute it
Attack vector
local (AV:L)source
EPSS
0.13%, higher than 2.2% of all CVEssource
CISA KEV
not listedthe KEV catalogue
Debian urgency
not yet assignedsource
Subsystem
drivers/iommu

Upstream fixes

The versions the CNA records as introducing and fixing this, and the commit for each. source

IntroducedFixed inCommit
5.56.12.91dbd76a537d8c
5.56.18.3320b3c566e270
5.57.0.10dae251ff11d2
5.57.1faad224fe0f0
5.4.1700

Why the CNA scored it this way

Quoted from the kernel CNA's own scoring file, word for word. A highlighted metric carries the most severe value CVSS v3.1 defines for it, which is what pushes the score up. source

AV:LAttack vector, local
The vulnerable path is reached through local PCI/IOMMU domain setup and updates, including VFIO/IOMMUFD or VM device-passthrough attach paths for a delegated device. It is not directly reachable by remote packets, but a local tenant or process controlling the assigned device can exercise the affected DMA alias state.
AC:LAttack complexity, low
Once the system has an AMD IOMMU and a PCI topology/device with DMA aliases, the wrong DTE clone occurs deterministically during alias setup or domain attach. There is no race or timing condition required.
PR:LPrivileges required, low
Exploitation requires control of, or access to, an assigned/owned PCI device or its IOMMUFD/VFIO context, but not host-root privileges in the target host kernel. In delegated passthrough deployments this is reachable by a low-privileged tenant context.
UI:NUser interaction, none
No victim user action is needed after the vulnerable device/topology is present and the device is attached or used. The attacker can trigger DMA behavior through the assigned device context.
S:CScope, changed
The bug can violate the IOMMU/DMA isolation boundary by applying a wrong or stale device-table entry to an alias requester ID. Per kernel guidance, IOMMU/DMA boundary bypass changes scope.
C:HConfidentiality impact, high
A wrong/stale DTE can give an alias requester ID DMA access under the wrong page table or domain, enabling reads of memory outside the intended DMA isolation boundary. This supports high confidentiality impact in the most severe reasonable passthrough scenario.
I:HIntegrity impact, high
The DTE contains DMA translation and read/write permission state, so propagating the wrong entry can allow DMA writes to memory outside the intended domain. That can corrupt host or peer-domain memory and supports high integrity impact.
A:HAvailability impact, high
Wrong DMA translations can produce repeated IOMMU faults, device failure, or memory corruption leading to kernel instability or crash. This supports high availability impact.