data built 2026-10-19T13:16:53Z

Look up another CVE · open CVE-2026-45988 in the interactive tracker

CVE-2026-45988

rxrpc: Fix re-decryption of RESPONSE packets

9.8 EPSS 0.5% AV:N

Published 2026-05-27 (5 months ago) by the Linux kernel CNA. Subsystem include/trace. Debian urgency: not yet assigned.

What to do, per Debian release

Debian's own status for CVE-2026-45988 in every release this site tracks, and what each one means in practice. Every status below is the one the Debian Security Team publishes for this CVE. source

ReleaseStatus VersionWhat this means
Debian 12bookwormvulnerable6.1.190-1No fix published anywhere yet, neither in Debian nor upstream for the series bookworm tracks. Watch the Debian tracker page for this CVE. Advisories for bookworm have historically landed a median of 23 days after publication.
Debian 13trixiefixed6.12.86-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 6.12.86-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian 14forkyfixed7.0.4-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 7.0.4-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian unstablesidfixed7.0.4-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 7.0.4-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.

The vulnerability

What the bug is

If a RESPONSE packet gets a temporary failure during processing, it may end up in a partially decrypted state - and then get requeued for a retry. Fix this by just discarding the packet; we will send another CHALLENGE packet and thereby elicit a further response. Similarly, discard an incoming CHALLENGE packet if we get an error whilst generating a RESPONSE; the server will send another CHALLENGE.

Where it lives

The fix touches these files. If the subsystem is one you do not use, the practical exposure is lower, though the package is still the vulnerable one.

include/trace/events/rxrpc.h
net/rxrpc/conn_event.c

What this is
RXRPC SOCKETS (AF_RXRPC)MAINTAINERS section matched on include/trace/events/rxrpc.h · linux-afs@lists.infradead.org · Supported
Kernel module
rxrpc

Check it on the machine

grep -w CONFIG_AF_RXRPC /boot/config-$(uname -r)

Reads the booted kernel's own configuration, on the machine and nowhere else. =y is built in, =m is a module, and an is not set line means the code is not there.

lsmod | grep -w rxrpc

Prints a line if that module is loaded right now, and nothing if it is not. One that is not loaded can still be loaded later by anything that needs it.

Show whether Debian builds this, per release

Debian builds this, but not on every flavour. At least one release below builds the code on some of its kernel flavours and not on others, so the answer depends on the architecture and flavour installed.

  • bookworm, trixie, forky, sidMnot built on amd64/cloud-amd64, arm64/cloud-arm64
M
a module where it is built at all; some flavours do not build it
Build switch
CONFIG_AF_RXRPC

From the configuration Debian publishes for every kernel flavour it builds. It covers only the architectures Debian ships a linux-config package for, and nothing about a kernel you built yourself. Debian's own status above stays authoritative about the source package.MAINTAINERS kbuild Makefiles Debian linux-config packages

Signals

Published
2026-05-27 (5 months ago)source
CVSS
9.8 critical
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Hsource recompute it
Attack vector
network (AV:N)source
EPSS
0.46%, higher than 38.2% of all CVEssource
CISA KEV
not listedthe KEV catalogue
Debian urgency
not yet assignedsource
Subsystem
include/trace

Upstream fixes

The versions the CNA records as introducing and fixing this, and the commit for each. source

IntroducedFixed inCommit
2.6.226.6.140d61482be4aae
2.6.226.12.867b8986830505
2.6.226.18.2776cb9a2d2522
2.6.227.0.4f55b38307017
2.6.227.10422e7a4883f

Why the CNA scored it this way

Quoted from the kernel CNA's own scoring file, word for word. A highlighted metric carries the most severe value CVSS v3.1 defines for it, which is what pushes the score up. source

AV:NAttack vector, network
rxrpc is a UDP/IP network protocol; the vulnerable CHALLENGE/RESPONSE handling processes packets received from a remote peer (a connecting client, or a malicious/spoofed AFS server) over the network.
AC:LAttack complexity, low
The bug is gated on a transient `-ENOMEM`/`-EAGAIN` during handshake processing, but an attacker can induce the required memory pressure by flooding the target with concurrent rxrpc handshakes, making the failing `GFP_NOFS` allocation reachable repeatably.
PR:NPrivileges required, none
The CHALLENGE/RESPONSE packets are processed during the security handshake before the connection is secured (`RXRPC_CONN_SERVICE_CHALLENGING`), so no authentication or credentials are needed to reach the code.
UI:NUser interaction, none
A server processing an incoming RESPONSE, and automated AFS clients/daemons processing a CHALLENGE, require no human interaction to trigger the fault.
S:UScope, unchanged
The corruption and its impact are confined to the kernel's own memory/security authority; no crossing of a VM, IOMMU, or sandbox boundary is involved.
C:HConfidentiality impact, high
The CHALLENGE-path refcount underflow frees the `rxrpc_connection` while still referenced; a UAF lets an attacker reallocate and read controlled freed-object contents, enabling kernel memory disclosure.
I:HIntegrity impact, high
The same use-after-free / refcount-underflow on the connection object enables heap grooming and write primitives over the freed structure, allowing kernel memory/control-flow corruption.
A:HAvailability impact, high
The double-put UAF and the re-decryption of partially-decrypted RESPONSE packets reliably oops/panic the kernel and abort connections, causing a denial of service.