data built 2026-10-19T13:16:53Z

Look up another CVE · open CVE-2026-43129 in the interactive tracker

CVE-2026-43129

ima: verify the previous kernel's IMA buffer lies in addressable RAM

EPSS 0.2%

Published 2026-05-06 (5 months ago) by the Linux kernel CNA. Subsystem include/linux. Debian urgency: not yet assigned.

What to do, per Debian release

Debian's own status for CVE-2026-43129 in every release this site tracks, and what each one means in practice. Every status below is the one the Debian Security Team publishes for this CVE. source

ReleaseStatus VersionWhat this means
Debian 12bookwormvulnerable6.1.190-1No fix published anywhere yet, neither in Debian nor upstream for the series bookworm tracks. Watch the Debian tracker page for this CVE. Advisories for bookworm have historically landed a median of 23 days after publication.
Debian 13trixiefixed6.12.85-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 6.12.85-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian 14forkyfixed6.19.6-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 6.19.6-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian unstablesidfixed6.19.6-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 6.19.6-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.

The vulnerability

What the bug is

Patch series "Address page fault in ima_restore_measurement_list()", v3. When the second-stage kernel is booted via kexec with a limiting command line such as "mem=<size>" we observe a pafe fault that happens. BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: ffff97793ff47000 RIP: ima_restore_measurement_list+0xdc/0x45a #PF: error_code(0x0000) not-present page This happens on x86_64 only, as this is already fixed in aarch64 in commit: cbf9c4b9617b ("of: check previous kernel's ima-kexec-buffer against memory bounds") This patch (of 3): When the second-stage kernel is booted with a limiting command line (e.g. "mem=<size>"), the IMA measurement buffer handed over from the previous kernel may fall outside the addressable RAM of the new kernel. Accessing such a buffer can fault during early restore. Introduce a small generic helper, ima_validate_range(), which verifies that a physical [start, end] range for the previous-kernel IMA buffer lies within addressable memory: - On x86, use pfn_range_is_mapped(). - On OF based architectures, use page_is_ram().

Where it lives

The fix touches these files. If the subsystem is one you do not use, the practical exposure is lower, though the package is still the vulnerable one.

include/linux/ima.h
security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c

What this is
INTEGRITY MEASUREMENT ARCHITECTURE (IMA)MAINTAINERS section matched on security/integrity/ima/ · linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org · Supported

Check it on the machine

grep -wE 'CONFIG_HAVE_IMA_KEXEC|CONFIG_IMA|CONFIG_INTEGRITY' /boot/config-$(uname -r)

Reads the booted kernel's own configuration, on the machine and nowhere else. =y is built in, =m is a module, and an is not set line means the code is not there.

Show whether Debian builds this, per release

Debian builds this, but not on every flavour. At least one release below builds the code on some of its kernel flavours and not on others, so the answer depends on the architecture and flavour installed.

  • bookwormYnot built on arm64/arm64, arm64/cloud-arm64, arm64/rt/arm64, armhf/armmp, armhf/armmp-lpae, armhf/rt/armmp, i386/686, i386/686-pae, i386/rt/686-pae, ppc64el/powerpc64le
  • trixieYnot built on arm64/arm64, arm64/arm64-16k, arm64/cloud-arm64, arm64/rt/arm64, armel/rpi, armhf/armmp, armhf/armmp-lpae, armhf/rt/armmp, ppc64el/powerpc64le, ppc64el/powerpc64le-64k, riscv64/riscv64, s390x/s390x
  • forky, sidYnot built on arm64/arm64, arm64/arm64-16k, arm64/cloud-arm64, arm64/rt-arm64, armhf/armmp, armhf/armmp-lpae, loong64/loong64, ppc64el/powerpc64le, ppc64el/powerpc64le-64k, riscv64/riscv64, s390x/s390x
Y
built in where it is built at all; some flavours do not build it
Build switches
CONFIG_HAVE_IMA_KEXEC, CONFIG_IMA, CONFIG_INTEGRITY
Reads as
all on means the file is compiled; any one off means it is not.

From the configuration Debian publishes for every kernel flavour it builds. It covers only the architectures Debian ships a linux-config package for, and nothing about a kernel you built yourself. Debian's own status above stays authoritative about the source package.MAINTAINERS kbuild Makefiles Debian linux-config packages

Signals

Published
2026-05-06 (5 months ago)source
CVSS
no vector published, unrated
Attack vector
not published
EPSS
0.16%, higher than 5.0% of all CVEssource
CISA KEV
not listedthe KEV catalogue
Debian urgency
not yet assignedsource
Subsystem
include/linux

Upstream fixes

The versions the CNA records as introducing and fixing this, and the commit for each. source

IntroducedFixed inCommit
6.06.6.14343308106a176
6.06.12.77f11d7d088f5e
6.06.18.169e1f51c1ad57
6.06.19.65366ec7d2f79
6.07.010d1c75ed438

Why the CNA scored it this way

The kernel CNA published no CVSS vector and no reasoning for CVE-2026-43129, which is why it is shown as unrated rather than given an invented score. 6,405 of the 20,413 CVEs here carry reasoning; this is not one of them.