data built 2026-10-19T13:16:53Z

Look up another CVE · open CVE-2025-40113 in the interactive tracker

CVE-2025-40113

remoteproc: qcom: pas: Shutdown lite ADSP DTB on X1E

EPSS 0.2%

Published 2025-11-12 (11 months ago) by the Linux kernel CNA. Subsystem drivers/remoteproc. Debian urgency: unimportant.

What to do, per Debian release

Debian's own status for CVE-2025-40113 in every release this site tracks, and what each one means in practice. Every status below is the one the Debian Security Team publishes for this CVE. source

ReleaseStatus VersionWhat this means
Debian 12bookwormnot affected6.1.190-1Nothing to do. bookworm never shipped the vulnerable code.
Debian 13trixievulnerable6.12.113-1No fix published anywhere yet, neither in Debian nor upstream for the series trixie tracks. Watch the Debian tracker page for this CVE. Advisories for trixie have historically landed a median of 11 days after publication.
Debian 14forkyfixed6.17.6-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 6.17.6-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian unstablesidfixed6.17.6-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 6.17.6-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.

The vulnerability

What the bug is

The ADSP firmware on X1E has separate firmware binaries for the main firmware and the DTB. The same applies for the "lite" firmware loaded by the boot firmware. When preparing to load the new ADSP firmware we shutdown the lite_pas_id for the main firmware, but we don't shutdown the corresponding lite pas_id for the DTB. The fact that we're leaving it "running" forever becomes obvious if you try to reuse (or just access) the memory region used by the "lite" firmware: The &adsp_boot_mem is accessible, but accessing the &adsp_boot_dtb_mem results in a crash. We don't support reusing the memory regions currently, but nevertheless we should not keep part of the lite firmware running. Fix this by adding the lite_dtb_pas_id and shutting it down as well. We don't have a way to detect if the lite firmware is actually running yet, so ignore the return status of qcom_scm_pas_shutdown() for now. This was already the case before, the assignment to "ret" is not used anywhere.

Where it lives

The fix touches these files. If the subsystem is one you do not use, the practical exposure is lower, though the package is still the vulnerable one.

drivers/remoteproc/qcom_q6v5_pas.c

What this is
REMOTE PROCESSOR (REMOTEPROC) SUBSYSTEMMAINTAINERS section matched on drivers/remoteproc/ · linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org · Maintained
Kernel module
qcom_q6v5_pas

Check it on the machine

grep -wE 'CONFIG_QCOM_Q6V5_PAS|CONFIG_REMOTEPROC' /boot/config-$(uname -r)

Reads the booted kernel's own configuration, on the machine and nowhere else. =y is built in, =m is a module, and an is not set line means the code is not there.

lsmod | grep -w qcom_q6v5_pas

Prints a line if that module is loaded right now, and nothing if it is not. One that is not loaded can still be loaded later by anything that needs it.

Show whether Debian builds this, per release

Debian does not build this code in 1 release. It does build it in 3 releases, so the answer depends on which release the machine runs.

  • bookwormn
  • trixieMnot built on amd64/amd64, amd64/cloud-amd64, amd64/rt/amd64, arm64/cloud-arm64, armel/rpi, armhf/armmp, armhf/armmp-lpae, armhf/rt/armmp, ppc64el/powerpc64le, ppc64el/powerpc64le-64k, riscv64/riscv64, s390x/s390x
  • forky, sidMnot built on amd64/amd64, amd64/cloud-amd64, amd64/rt-amd64, arm64/cloud-arm64, armhf/armmp, armhf/armmp-lpae, loong64/loong64, ppc64el/powerpc64le, ppc64el/powerpc64le-64k, riscv64/riscv64, s390x/s390x
n
not enabled on any flavour - this release does not build the code
M
a module where it is built at all; some flavours do not build it
Build switches
CONFIG_QCOM_Q6V5_PAS, CONFIG_REMOTEPROC
Reads as
all on means the file is compiled; any one off means it is not.

From the configuration Debian publishes for every kernel flavour it builds. It covers only the architectures Debian ships a linux-config package for, and nothing about a kernel you built yourself. Debian's own status above stays authoritative about the source package.MAINTAINERS kbuild Makefiles Debian linux-config packages

Signals

Published
2025-11-12 (11 months ago)source
CVSS
no vector published, unrated
Attack vector
not published
EPSS
0.20%, higher than 8.9% of all CVEssource
CISA KEV
not listedthe KEV catalogue
Debian urgency
unimportantsource
Subsystem
drivers/remoteproc

Upstream fixes

The versions the CNA records as introducing and fixing this, and the commit for each. source

IntroducedFixed inCommit
6.96.17.3ee150acd273a
6.96.18142964960c7c

Why the CNA scored it this way

The kernel CNA published no CVSS vector and no reasoning for CVE-2025-40113, which is why it is shown as unrated rather than given an invented score. 6,405 of the 20,413 CVEs here carry reasoning; this is not one of them.