data built 2026-10-19T13:16:53Z

Look up another CVE · open CVE-2025-39775 in the interactive tracker

CVE-2025-39775

mm/mremap: fix WARN with uffd that has remap events disabled

EPSS 0.1%

Published 2025-09-11 (13 months ago) by the Linux kernel CNA. Subsystem mm. Debian urgency: unimportant.

What to do, per Debian release

Debian's own status for CVE-2025-39775 in every release this site tracks, and what each one means in practice. Every status below is the one the Debian Security Team publishes for this CVE. source

ReleaseStatus VersionWhat this means
Debian 12bookwormnot affected6.1.190-1Nothing to do. bookworm never shipped the vulnerable code.
Debian 13trixievulnerable6.12.113-1No fix published anywhere yet, neither in Debian nor upstream for the series trixie tracks. Watch the Debian tracker page for this CVE. Advisories for trixie have historically landed a median of 11 days after publication.
Debian 14forkyfixed6.16.5-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 6.16.5-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian unstablesidfixed6.16.5-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 6.16.5-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.

The vulnerability

What the bug is

Registering userfaultd on a VMA that spans at least one PMD and then mremap()'ing that VMA can trigger a WARN when recovering from a failed page table move due to a page table allocation error. The code ends up doing the right thing (recurse, avoiding moving actual page tables), but triggering that WARN is unpleasant: WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 6133 at mm/mremap.c:357 move_normal_pmd mm/mremap.c:357 [inline] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 6133 at mm/mremap.c:357 move_pgt_entry mm/mremap.c:595 [inline] WARNING: CPU: 2 PID: 6133 at mm/mremap.c:357 move_page_tables+0x3832/0x44a0 mm/mremap.c:852 Modules linked in: CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 6133 Comm: syz.0.19 Not tainted 6.17.0-rc1-syzkaller-00004-g53e760d89498 #0 PREEMPT(full) Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009), BIOS 1.16.3-debian-1.16.3-2~bpo12+1 04/01/2014 RIP: 0010:move_normal_pmd mm/mremap.c:357 [inline] RIP: 0010:move_pgt_entry mm/mremap.c:595 [inline] RIP: 0010:move_page_tables+0x3832/0x44a0 mm/mremap.c:852 Code: ... RSP: 0018:ffffc900037a76d8 EFLAGS: 00010293 RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: 0000000032930007 RCX: ffffffff820c6645 RDX: ffff88802e56a440 RSI: ffffffff820c7201 RDI: 0000000000000007 RBP: ffff888037728fc0 R08: 0000000000000007 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000032930007 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: ffffc900037a79a8 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: dffffc0000000000 FS: 000055556316a500(0000) GS:ffff8880d68bc000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 0000001b30863fff CR3: 0000000050171000 CR4: 0000000000352ef0 Call Trace: <TASK> copy_vma_and_data+0x468/0x790 mm/mremap.c:1215 move_vma+0x548/0x1780 mm/mremap.c:1282 mremap_to+0x1b7/0x450 mm/mremap.c:1406 do_mremap+0xfad/0x1f80 mm/mremap.c:1921 __do_sys_mremap+0x119/0x170 mm/mremap.c:1977 do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:63 [inline] do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x4c0 arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f RIP: 0033:0x7f00d0b8ebe9 Code: ... RSP: 002b:00007ffe5ea5ee98 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000019 RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00007f00d0db5fa0 RCX: 00007f00d0b8ebe9 RDX: 0000000000400000 RSI: 0000000000c00000 RDI: 0000200000000000 RBP: 00007ffe5ea5eef0 R08: 0000200000c00000 R09: 0000000000000000 R10: 0000000000000003 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 0000000000000002 R13: 00007f00d0db5fa0 R14: 00007f00d0db5fa0 R15: 0000000000000005 </TASK> The underlying issue is that we recurse during the original page table move, but not during the recovery move. Fix it by checking for both VMAs and performing the check before the pmd_none() sanity check. Add a new helper where we perform+document that check for the PMD and PUD level. Thanks to Harry for bisecting.

Where it lives

The fix touches these files. If the subsystem is one you do not use, the practical exposure is lower, though the package is still the vulnerable one.

mm/mremap.c

What this is
MEMORY MAPPINGMAINTAINERS section matched on mm/mremap.c · linux-mm@kvack.org · Maintained
Show whether Debian builds this, per release

Not established. This site could not find the build rule for the affected file in the kernel trees Debian ships, so it has no answer about whether Debian compiles this code. Read that as unknown, never as absent.

  • bookworm, trixie, forky, sid?
?
not established - no Makefile entry for the affected file

Where a release above reads "not established", no build rule for the affected file was found in that release's kernel tree. That is a gap in this lookup, not a finding that the code is absent.

From the configuration Debian publishes for every kernel flavour it builds. It covers only the architectures Debian ships a linux-config package for, and nothing about a kernel you built yourself. Debian's own status above stays authoritative about the source package.MAINTAINERS

Signals

Published
2025-09-11 (13 months ago)source
CVSS
no vector published, unrated
Attack vector
not published
EPSS
0.13%, higher than 2.4% of all CVEssource
CISA KEV
not listedthe KEV catalogue
Debian urgency
unimportantsource
Subsystem
mm

Upstream fixes

The versions the CNA records as introducing and fixing this, and the commit for each. source

IntroducedFixed inCommit
6.136.16.4d70ca21f7bff
6.136.17772e5b4a5e83
6.12.1100

Why the CNA scored it this way

The kernel CNA published no CVSS vector and no reasoning for CVE-2025-39775, which is why it is shown as unrated rather than given an invented score. 6,405 of the 20,413 CVEs here carry reasoning; this is not one of them.