data built 2026-10-19T13:16:53Z

Look up another CVE · open CVE-2025-38722 in the interactive tracker

CVE-2025-38722

habanalabs: fix UAF in export_dmabuf()

7.8 EPSS 0.2% AV:L

Published 2025-09-04 (13 months ago) by the Linux kernel CNA. Subsystem drivers/accel. Debian urgency: not yet assigned.

What to do, per Debian release

Debian's own status for CVE-2025-38722 in every release this site tracks, and what each one means in practice. Every status below is the one the Debian Security Team publishes for this CVE. source

ReleaseStatus VersionWhat this means
Debian 12bookwormvulnerable6.1.190-1No fix published anywhere yet, neither in Debian nor upstream for the series bookworm tracks. Watch the Debian tracker page for this CVE. Advisories for bookworm have historically landed a median of 23 days after publication.
Debian 13trixiefixed6.12.43-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 6.12.43-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian 14forkyfixed6.16.3-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 6.16.3-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian unstablesidfixed6.16.3-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 6.16.3-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.

The vulnerability

What the bug is

As soon as we'd inserted a file reference into descriptor table, another thread could close it. That's fine for the case when all we are doing is returning that descriptor to userland (it's a race, but it's a userland race and there's nothing the kernel can do about it). However, if we follow fd_install() with any kind of access to objects that would be destroyed on close (be it the struct file itself or anything destroyed by its ->release()), we have a UAF. dma_buf_fd() is a combination of reserving a descriptor and fd_install(). habanalabs export_dmabuf() calls it and then proceeds to access the objects destroyed on close. In particular, it grabs an extra reference to another struct file that will be dropped as part of ->release() for ours; that "will be" is actually "might have already been". Fix that by reserving descriptor before anything else and do fd_install() only when everything had been set up. As a side benefit, we no longer have the failure exit with file already created, but reference to underlying file (as well as ->dmabuf_export_cnt, etc.) not grabbed yet; unlike dma_buf_fd(), fd_install() can't fail.

Where it lives

The fix touches these files. If the subsystem is one you do not use, the practical exposure is lower, though the package is still the vulnerable one.

drivers/accel/habanalabs/common/memory.c

What this is
HABANALABS PCI DRIVERMAINTAINERS section matched on drivers/accel/habanalabs/ · dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org · Supported
Show whether Debian builds this, per release

Not established. This site could not find the build rule for the affected file in the kernel trees Debian ships, so it has no answer about whether Debian compiles this code. Read that as unknown, never as absent.

  • bookworm, trixie, forky, sid?
?
not established - no Makefile entry for the affected file

Where a release above reads "not established", no build rule for the affected file was found in that release's kernel tree. That is a gap in this lookup, not a finding that the code is absent.

From the configuration Debian publishes for every kernel flavour it builds. It covers only the architectures Debian ships a linux-config package for, and nothing about a kernel you built yourself. Debian's own status above stays authoritative about the source package.MAINTAINERS

Signals

Published
2025-09-04 (13 months ago)source
CVSS
7.8 high
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Hsource recompute it
Attack vector
local (AV:L)source
EPSS
0.16%, higher than 4.3% of all CVEssource
CISA KEV
not listedthe KEV catalogue
Debian urgency
not yet assignedsource
Subsystem
drivers/accel

Upstream fixes

The versions the CNA records as introducing and fixing this, and the commit for each. source

IntroducedFixed inCommit
5.166.12.43c07886761fd6
5.166.15.1140deceb38f9d
5.166.16.255c232d7e024
5.166.1733927f3d0ecd

Why the CNA scored it this way

Quoted from the kernel CNA's own scoring file, word for word. A highlighted metric carries the most severe value CVSS v3.1 defines for it, which is what pushes the score up. source

AV:LAttack vector, local
The bug is reached through the DRM_IOCTL_HL_MEMORY ioctl (HL_MEM_OP_EXPORT_DMABUF_FD) on the local /dev/accel/accelN character device, requiring local system access. No network or physical vector is involved.
AC:LAttack complexity, low
The attacker owns both sides of the race — one thread issues the export ioctl while a sibling thread spins on close() of the deterministically-numbered fd in the same process's fd table — and the ioctl can be retried indefinitely until the window is won. No condition depends on external state the attacker cannot influence.
PR:LPrivileges required, low
The ioctl is registered with flags 0, so drm_ioctl_permit(), accel_open(), hl_device_open() and hl_mem_ioctl() perform no capability, root, or DRM-auth check; only an open fd on the accel node is required, which unprivileged compute users and containerized AI workloads normally have.
UI:NUser interaction, none
The attacking process triggers the race entirely on its own with two of its own threads. No victim action, mount, or file open is needed.
S:UScope, unchanged
The premature reference drops corrupt kernel objects (struct hl_ctx, struct file) within the same kernel security authority. No IOMMU, hypervisor, or sandbox boundary is crossed.
C:HConfidentiality impact, high
The use-after-free lets the attacker reclaim the freed hl_ctx/struct file slab objects with controlled content and have the kernel dereference them (ctx->hdev, ctx->hpriv->file_priv->filp), and the premature fput() on the accel device file yields a DirtyCred-style file UAF enabling arbitrary kernel memory disclosure.
I:HIntegrity impact, high
The exporting thread performs atomic refcount increments (hl_ctx_get, atomic_inc, get_file) through pointers read out of freed, attacker-reclaimable memory, giving a write primitive at an influenceable address; a dangling struct file reference is a well-established path to control-flow hijack and privilege escalation.
A:HAvailability impact, high
Losing the race yields a NULL pointer dereference in memhash_node_export_put() (ctx is still NULL) or refcount underflow and use-after-free on the context and device file, causing an immediate kernel oops/panic that any local user can trigger repeatedly.