data built 2026-10-19T13:16:53Z

Look up another CVE · open CVE-2025-38544 in the interactive tracker

CVE-2025-38544

rxrpc: Fix bug due to prealloc collision

EPSS 0.2%

Published 2025-08-16 (14 months ago) by the Linux kernel CNA. Subsystem net/rxrpc. Debian urgency: not yet assigned.

What to do, per Debian release

Debian's own status for CVE-2025-38544 in every release this site tracks, and what each one means in practice. Every status below is the one the Debian Security Team publishes for this CVE. source

ReleaseStatus VersionWhat this means
Debian 12bookwormvulnerable6.1.190-1No fix published anywhere yet, neither in Debian nor upstream for the series bookworm tracks. Watch the Debian tracker page for this CVE. Advisories for bookworm have historically landed a median of 23 days after publication.
Debian 13trixiefixed6.12.41-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 6.12.41-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian 14forkyfixed6.16.3-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 6.16.3-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian unstablesidfixed6.16.3-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 6.16.3-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.

The vulnerability

What the bug is

When userspace is using AF_RXRPC to provide a server, it has to preallocate incoming calls and assign to them call IDs that will be used to thread related recvmsg() and sendmsg() together. The preallocated call IDs will automatically be attached to calls as they come in until the pool is empty. To the kernel, the call IDs are just arbitrary numbers, but userspace can use the call ID to hold a pointer to prepared structs. In any case, the user isn't permitted to create two calls with the same call ID (call IDs become available again when the call ends) and EBADSLT should result from sendmsg() if an attempt is made to preallocate a call with an in-use call ID. However, the cleanup in the error handling will trigger both assertions in rxrpc_cleanup_call() because the call isn't marked complete and isn't marked as having been released. Fix this by setting the call state in rxrpc_service_prealloc_one() and then marking it as being released before calling the cleanup function.

Where it lives

The fix touches these files. If the subsystem is one you do not use, the practical exposure is lower, though the package is still the vulnerable one.

net/rxrpc/call_accept.c

What this is
RXRPC SOCKETS (AF_RXRPC)MAINTAINERS section matched on net/rxrpc/ · linux-afs@lists.infradead.org · Supported
Kernel module
rxrpc

Check it on the machine

grep -w CONFIG_AF_RXRPC /boot/config-$(uname -r)

Reads the booted kernel's own configuration, on the machine and nowhere else. =y is built in, =m is a module, and an is not set line means the code is not there.

lsmod | grep -w rxrpc

Prints a line if that module is loaded right now, and nothing if it is not. One that is not loaded can still be loaded later by anything that needs it.

Show whether Debian builds this, per release

Debian builds this, but not on every flavour. At least one release below builds the code on some of its kernel flavours and not on others, so the answer depends on the architecture and flavour installed.

  • bookworm, trixie, forky, sidMnot built on amd64/cloud-amd64, arm64/cloud-arm64
M
a module where it is built at all; some flavours do not build it
Build switch
CONFIG_AF_RXRPC

From the configuration Debian publishes for every kernel flavour it builds. It covers only the architectures Debian ships a linux-config package for, and nothing about a kernel you built yourself. Debian's own status above stays authoritative about the source package.MAINTAINERS kbuild Makefiles Debian linux-config packages

Signals

Published
2025-08-16 (14 months ago)source
CVSS
no vector published, unrated
Attack vector
not published
EPSS
0.15%, higher than 4.1% of all CVEssource
CISA KEV
not listedthe KEV catalogue
Debian urgency
not yet assignedsource
Subsystem
net/rxrpc

Upstream fixes

The versions the CNA records as introducing and fixing this, and the commit for each. source

IntroducedFixed inCommit
4.96.6.99432c5363cd6f
4.96.12.395385ad53793d
4.96.15.7d8ffb47a4439
4.96.1669e4186773c6

Why the CNA scored it this way

The kernel CNA published no CVSS vector and no reasoning for CVE-2025-38544, which is why it is shown as unrated rather than given an invented score. 6,405 of the 20,413 CVEs here carry reasoning; this is not one of them.