data built 2026-10-19T13:16:53Z

Look up another CVE · open CVE-2024-47703 in the interactive tracker

CVE-2024-47703

bpf, lsm: Add check for BPF LSM return value

7.8 EPSS 0.2% AV:L

Published 2024-10-21 (24 months ago) by the Linux kernel CNA. Subsystem include/linux. Debian urgency: not yet assigned.

What to do, per Debian release

Debian's own status for CVE-2024-47703 in every release this site tracks, and what each one means in practice. Every status below is the one the Debian Security Team publishes for this CVE. source

ReleaseStatus VersionWhat this means
Debian 12bookwormvulnerable6.1.190-1No fix published anywhere yet, neither in Debian nor upstream for the series bookworm tracks. Watch the Debian tracker page for this CVE. Advisories for bookworm have historically landed a median of 23 days after publication.
Debian 13trixiefixed6.11.2-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 6.11.2-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian 14forkyfixed6.11.2-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 6.11.2-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian unstablesidfixed6.11.2-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 6.11.2-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.

The vulnerability

What the bug is

A bpf prog returning a positive number attached to file_alloc_security hook makes kernel panic. This happens because file system can not filter out the positive number returned by the LSM prog using IS_ERR, and misinterprets this positive number as a file pointer. Given that hook file_alloc_security never returned positive number before the introduction of BPF LSM, and other BPF LSM hooks may encounter similar issues, this patch adds LSM return value check in verifier, to ensure no unexpected value is returned.

Where it lives

The fix touches these files. If the subsystem is one you do not use, the practical exposure is lower, though the package is still the vulnerable one.

include/linux/bpf.h
include/linux/bpf_lsm.h
kernel/bpf/bpf_lsm.c
kernel/bpf/btf.c
kernel/bpf/verifier.c

What this is
BPF [CORE]MAINTAINERS section matched on include/linux/bpf* · bpf@vger.kernel.org · Maintained

Check it on the machine

grep -wE 'CONFIG_BPF|CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL' /boot/config-$(uname -r)

Reads the booted kernel's own configuration, on the machine and nowhere else. =y is built in, =m is a module, and an is not set line means the code is not there.

Show whether Debian builds this, per release

Debian builds this code. Every release below compiles the affected file into the kernels it ships.

  • bookworm, trixie, forky, sidy
y
built into the kernel image on every flavour - only a patch removes it
Build switches
CONFIG_BPF, CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL
Reads as
all on means the file is compiled; any one off means it is not.

From the configuration Debian publishes for every kernel flavour it builds. It covers only the architectures Debian ships a linux-config package for, and nothing about a kernel you built yourself. Debian's own status above stays authoritative about the source package.MAINTAINERS kbuild Makefiles Debian linux-config packages

Signals

Published
2024-10-21 (24 months ago)source
CVSS
7.8 high
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:Hsource recompute it
Attack vector
local (AV:L)source
EPSS
0.22%, higher than 11.2% of all CVEssource
CISA KEV
not listedthe KEV catalogue
Debian urgency
not yet assignedsource
Subsystem
include/linux

Upstream fixes

The versions the CNA records as introducing and fixing this, and the commit for each. source

IntroducedFixed inCommit
5.76.10.131050727d83e7
5.76.11.227ca3e20fe80
5.76.125d99e198be27

Why the CNA scored it this way

Quoted from the kernel CNA's own scoring file, word for word. A highlighted metric carries the most severe value CVSS v3.1 defines for it, which is what pushes the score up. source

AV:LAttack vector, local
The flaw is reached by loading and attaching a crafted BPF LSM program through the local `bpf()` syscall and then triggering it with a local `open()`; there is no network or adjacent path into the verifier.
AC:LAttack complexity, low
Triggering is fully deterministic and entirely attacker-constructed — load an `SEC("lsm/file_alloc_security")` program that returns a chosen positive constant, attach it, then call `open()` — with no race, no dependence on uncontrolled memory layout, and `CONFIG_BPF_LSM` plus `"bpf"` in the default `CONFIG_LSM` list on mainstream distro and Android kernels.
PR:LPrivileges required, low
The attacker needs `CAP_BPF`+`CAP_PERFMON`, which were deliberately split out of `CAP_SYS_ADMIN` so BPF tracing/LSM could be granted to non-administrative principals (observability agents, sidecars, containers), and `bpf_token_capable()` resolves to `ns_capable(token->userns, ...)`, so with a delegating bpffs mount a user-namespace-confined non-root principal can load `BPF_LSM_MAC` programs. This is a constrained delegated privilege whose stated boundary is verifier soundness, not administrative control of the kernel.
UI:NUser interaction, none
The attacker performs every step in its own processes — load, attach, and then trigger with its own `open()` call. No victim action, mount, or file access by another user is required.
S:UScope, unchanged
Both the flawed component (BPF verifier return-value check) and the impacted component (VFS/kernel memory) are the kernel itself under a single security authority; no VM, IOMMU, or hypervisor boundary is crossed.
C:HConfidentiality impact, high
The unchecked positive return becomes an attacker-chosen `struct file *` in the `[1, 0x7FFFFFFF]` user range that `IS_ERR()` fails to reject, so a pre-mapped fake `struct file` with a controlled `f_op` yields arbitrary kernel-memory reads and disclosure; the verifier bypass also lets LSM access-control verdicts be forged, defeating confidentiality enforcement.
I:HIntegrity impact, high
A verifier-sanctioned out-of-contract return value hands the VFS a fully attacker-controlled `struct file`, the canonical primitive for arbitrary kernel write and control-flow hijack via `f_op` after `fd_install()`, and independently allows LSM allow/deny decisions to be forged.
A:HAvailability impact, high
The commit message documents that a positive `file_alloc_security` return "makes kernel panic" because the filesystem dereferences it as a file pointer; any `open()` on the system then oopses, giving a trivially repeatable full denial of service.