data built 2026-10-19T13:16:53Z

Look up another CVE · open CVE-2024-36949 in the interactive tracker

CVE-2024-36949

amd/amdkfd: sync all devices to wait all processes being evicted

EPSS 0.2%

Published 2024-05-30 (2 years ago) by the Linux kernel CNA. Subsystem drivers/gpu. Debian urgency: not yet assigned.

What to do, per Debian release

Debian's own status for CVE-2024-36949 in every release this site tracks, and what each one means in practice. Every status below is the one the Debian Security Team publishes for this CVE. source

ReleaseStatus VersionWhat this means
Debian 12bookwormvulnerable6.1.190-1No fix published anywhere yet, neither in Debian nor upstream for the series bookworm tracks. Watch the Debian tracker page for this CVE. Advisories for bookworm have historically landed a median of 23 days after publication.
Debian 13trixiefixed6.8.11-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 6.8.11-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian 14forkyfixed6.8.11-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 6.8.11-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.
Debian unstablesidfixed6.8.11-1Update the kernel and reboot. Fixed in 6.8.11-1. A running kernel keeps the old code until the machine restarts.

The vulnerability

What the bug is

If there are more than one device doing reset in parallel, the first device will call kfd_suspend_all_processes() to evict all processes on all devices, this call takes time to finish. other device will start reset and recover without waiting. if the process has not been evicted before doing recover, it will be restored, then caused page fault.

Where it lives

The fix touches these files. If the subsystem is one you do not use, the practical exposure is lower, though the package is still the vulnerable one.

drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_device.c

What this is
AMD KFDMAINTAINERS section matched on drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/ · amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org · Supported
Show whether Debian builds this, per release

Not established. This site could not find the build rule for the affected file in the kernel trees Debian ships, so it has no answer about whether Debian compiles this code. Read that as unknown, never as absent.

  • bookworm, trixie, forky, sid?
?
not established - no Makefile entry for the affected file

Where a release above reads "not established", no build rule for the affected file was found in that release's kernel tree. That is a gap in this lookup, not a finding that the code is absent.

From the configuration Debian publishes for every kernel flavour it builds. It covers only the architectures Debian ships a linux-config package for, and nothing about a kernel you built yourself. Debian's own status above stays authoritative about the source package.MAINTAINERS

Signals

Published
2024-05-30 (2 years ago)source
CVSS
no vector published, unrated
Attack vector
not published
EPSS
0.22%, higher than 12.0% of all CVEssource
CISA KEV
not listedthe KEV catalogue
Debian urgency
not yet assignedsource
Subsystem
drivers/gpu

Upstream fixes

The versions the CNA records as introducing and fixing this, and the commit for each. source

IntroducedFixed inCommit
3.196.6.31b6f6626528fe
3.196.8.10ed28ef3840bb
3.196.9d06af584be5a

Why the CNA scored it this way

The kernel CNA published no CVSS vector and no reasoning for CVE-2024-36949, which is why it is shown as unrated rather than given an invented score. 6,405 of the 20,413 CVEs here carry reasoning; this is not one of them.